Quistclose Investments Ltd v Rolls Razor Ltd ((in Liquidation))

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeLord Reid,Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest,Lord Guest,Lord Pearce,Lord Wilberforce
Judgment Date31 October 1968
Judgment citation (vLex)[1968] UKHL J1031-3
Date31 October 1968
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
532 cases
  • Chandrakant Patel v Salman Mirza
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 5 July 2013
    ...modern, concept of unjust enrichment. Secondly, it is said that the monies monies were held by Mr Mirza on trust for Mr Patel, either as a Quistclose trust or (if different) a resulting trust. 13 In addition, though it found little place in the argument, it was also contended in the pleadin......
  • Saipem (M) Sdn Bhd v AG & P (M) Sdn Bhd ((in Liquidation))
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1996
  • Guardian Ocean Cargoes Ltd v Banco do Brasil
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 2 March 1994
    ...on compound interest and on the date from which simple interest should run. LORD JUSTICE MANN 53 I agree LORD JUSTICE BUTLER-SLOSSQuistclose trust, after the decision of the House of Lords in Barclays Bank v Quistclose Investments [1970] AC 567. The payments were made for the specific purpo......
  • Jagdis Singh Banta Singh v Zakaria Yahaya and Another
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
  • Termination of Bitcoin trading account
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 15 February 2021
    ...so that these decisions are defensible should they later be challenged. Footnotes 1. Per Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd [1970] AC 567. 2. [2019] EWHC 879 Edward Levy function JDS_LoadEvent(func) { var existingOnLoad = window.onload; if (typeof window.onload != 'function') { ......
  • Bankruptcy law update: The loan agreement created a trust so avoided the preference provisions – a setback for trustees
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 1 June 2017
    ...We will be watching with interest to see if this case is appealed. Footnote 1Barclays Bank Limited v Quistclose Investments Limited [1970] AC 567 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific ......
  • Court Of Appeal Confirms That Correspondent Banking Obligations Are Personal, Not Proprietary
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 16 May 2019
    ...B's debt owed to C, a Quistclose trust (so named after the House of Lords decision in Barclays bank Ltd v. Quistclose Investments Ltd [1970] AC 567) may be deemed to arise in the event that B applies the money for a different purpose. In such circumstances, B may not use the funds save for ......
26 books & journal articles
  • Restitution
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2007, December 2007
    • 1 December 2007
    ...decision is unexceptional. The plaintiff did not appear to have argued a Quistclose trust (Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd[1970] AC 567) on the basis that the money was to be used only for a specific purpose (see T M Yeo and H Tjio, ‘The Quistclose Trust’(2003) 119 LQR 8 at 1......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Probate Disputes - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 August 2022
    ...LR 5 QB 549, 39 LJQB 237, 22 LT 813, Ct of QB 42, 47, 48, 49, 53, 55, 56, 57, 60, 61, 62, 229 Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments [1970] AC 567, [1968] 3 All ER 651, [1968] 3 WLR 1097, HL 176 Barrett v Bem & Ors [2011] EWHC 1247 (Ch), [2012] Ch 573, [2011] 3 WLR 1193, [2011] All ER (......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Trusts. Second Edition Part Four. The Trustee
    • 1 September 2005
    ...276 (C.A.)................................................................... 169 Barclay’s Bank Ltd. v. Quistclose Investments Ltd., [1968] 3 All E.R. 651, [1968] 3 W.L.R. 1097 (H.L.).......................................................................... 71 Barford v. Street (1809), 16 ......
  • UNJUST ENRICHMENT, PROPRIETARY SUBROGATION AND UNSATISFACTORY EXPLANATIONS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...at [131] and [140]. 64Bank of Cyprus UK Ltd v Menelaou[2015] UKSC 66 at [135], referring to Quistclose Investments Ltd v Rolls Razor Ltd[1970] AC 567 and Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley[2002] 2 AC 164. 65Bank of Cyprus UK Ltd v Menelaou[2015] UKSC 66 at [134] and [137]–[139]. 66Bank of Cyprus UK L......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT