R (Baker) v Bath and North East Somerset District Council

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2009] EWHC 595 (Admin)
Date2009
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 cases
  • The Queen (on the Application of Peter Evans) v Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Victacress Salads Ltd (Interested Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • April 19, 2013
    ...are associated with a proposal are taken into account. For the former proposition he relied on a statement by Collins J in R (Baker) v Bath and ME Somerset Council [2009] EWHC 595 (Admin); [2009] ENV LR 27 per Collins J at [22] that: "It is very difficult to divorce changes and extensions ......
  • R (Catt) v Brighton and Hove City Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • November 25, 2009
    ...considered in isolation but together with the cumulative effects of all other uses of the site: see R (Baker) v Bath & North Somerset DC [2009] EWHC 595 Admin. It is submitted that it is clear from the screening opinion and the report to the committee that the football use was considered on......
  • R (on the application of John Catt) v Brighton & Hove City Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • April 23, 2013
    ...opinion of 15 June 2011. It accepted that that screening opinion "does not reflect" the decision of Collins J. in R. (Baker) v Bath and North-East Somerset District Council [2009] EWHC 595 (Admin), and it acknowledged that the planning permission granted on 8 August 2011 (though it gave th......
  • River Faughan Anglers Limited’s Application
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
    • March 13, 2014
    ...C-215/06) at paragraph 49). [77] The English High Court in R (on the application of Baker) v Bath and North East Somerset Council [2009] EWHC 595 (Admin) concluded that in determining whether an ES is required, the likely significant impact of a change to an existing EIA development must be......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Planning Law. A Practitioner's Handbook Contents
    • August 30, 2019
    ...49 JP 532, CA 525, 529 Bailey v Jamieson (1876) 1 CPD 329, 40 JP 486, 24 WR 456, CtCP 597 Baker v Bath & North East Somerset Council [2009] EWHC 595 (Admin), [2009] Env LR 27, [2010] 1 P & CR 4, [2009] All ER (D) 169 (Jul) 340 Bakewell Management Ltd v Brandwood [2004] UKHL 14, [2004] 2 AC ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT