R (Belhaj) v Director of Public Prosecutions and another
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Lloyd-Jones,Lady Hale,Lord Sumption,Lord Mance,Lord Wilson |
| Judgment Date | 04 July 2018 |
| Neutral Citation | [2018] UKSC 33 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
38 cases
-
Boris Mints v PJSC National Bank Trust
...unless this is “clearly authorised” by primary legislation. She noted that the appellants relied in particular on R (Belhaj) v DPP [2019] AC 593 (“ Belhaj”) where the Supreme Court found that it was clear from the Justice and Security Act 2013 that Parliament did intend to curtail fundament......
-
Graham William Phillips v The Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs
...There is therefore no scope for the principle of legality to operate: R (Belhaj) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2017] UKSC 33; [2019] AC 593 per Lord Lloyd-Jones at [42]. Put another way, the intention of the legislature to curtail fundamental rights emerges by way of “necessary implic......
-
Watts
...2012 plc v Advocate General for Scotland [2017] BTC 22 (RFC) Christianuyi Ltd v R & C Commrs [2018] BTC 504 (Christianuyi) Balhaj v DPP [2018] UKSC 33, [2019] AC 593 (Balhaj) Andrew [2019] TC 07027 (Andrew) Ingenious Games LLP v R & C Commrs [2019] BTC 521 (Ingenious) R & C Commrs v SSE Gen......
-
McGuinness's (Deborah) Application (No 3) v The Sentence Review Commissioners
...on this troubled subject, including the decisions in Re JR27 [2010] NIQB 12 and R 16 (Belhaj) v Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs [2018] UKSC 33, at [20], with its stress on ‘a criminal matter’ [our emphasis], in a context marked by a need for acute expedition and involving the liberty......
Request a trial to view additional results