R (Carol Candlish) and Hastings Borough Council and Hastings and Bexhill Renaissance Ltd (trading as Sea Space)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 2005 |
| Neutral Citation | [2005] EWHC 1539 (Admin) |
| Date | 2005 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Barbara Burridge v Breckland District Council Greenshoots Energy Ltd (Interested Party)
...defeat the object of the regulations by piecemeal development proposals." 30 In R (on the application of Candlish) v Hastings BC [2006] Env LR 13, Davis J stated, at paragraph 61: "It is plain that the 1999 Regulations are geared to the actual application for development consent. That that......
-
The Queen (on the application of Save Britain's Heritage) v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council (Interested Party)
... ... , including where new shops and open space would be located and which areas would be ... State misunderstood the decision in R(Candlish) v Hastings Borough Council [2006]1P.C.R.18 ... to implement part of the Hastings and Bexhill Five Point Plan with the aim of providing ... ...
-
R Save Woolley Valley Action Group Ltd v Bath and North East Somerset Council (1) Golden Valley Paddocks Ltd (Interested Parties) (2) Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
... ... In R (A) v London Borough of Croydon [2009] UKSC 8, [2009] 1 WLR ... that, because the threshold refers to floor space in a building, it must follow that an "intensive ... relied on the judgment of Davis J in R (Carol Candlish) v Hastings Borough Council [2005] ... ...
-
Louise Bowen-west v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (First Defendant) Northamptonshire County Council (Second Defendant) Augean Plc (Third Defendant)
...decision-making process. 52 (ii) The development to be assessed is that for which permission is sought: R(Candlish) v Hastings BC [2005] EWHC 1539 (Admin) at 53 (iii) The requirement to consider indirect et cetera effects of the development (EIA Regulation Schedule 4 Part I paragraph 4) is......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...v Bath & NE Somerset Council [2009] EWHC 3320 (Admin), [2009] NPC 155, [2009] All ER (D) 169 (Jul) 55 R (Candlish) v Hastings BC [2005] EWHC 1539 (Admin), [2006] 1 P & CR 18, [2005] All ER (D) 178 55 R (Ecogen Developments Ltd) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2002] EWHC 996 (Ad......
-
Environmental Impact Assessment
...18 NPPG at Paragraph: 020 Reference ID: 4-020-20170728. 19 R v Swale BC ex parte RSPB [1991] 1 PLR 6. 20 R (Candlish) v Hastings BC [2005] EWHC 1539 (Admin), [2005] All ER (D) 178; R (Baker) v Bath & NE Somerset Council [2009] EWHC 3320 (Admin), [2009] All ER (D) 169 (Jul). 56 Renewable Ene......
-
Environmental Impact Assessment
...in any event, before the end of the 21-day period when the application is deemed to have been refused. 24 21 R (Candlish) v Hastings BC [2006] Env LR 13; Baker v Bath & NE Somerset Council [2009] All ER (D) 169 (Jul). 22 See further information requirements in reg 6(2) and (3). 23 Regulatio......