R G and H v Upper Tribunal Secretary of State for the Home Department (Interested Party)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMr Justice Walker
Judgment Date11 February 2016
Neutral Citation[2016] EWHC 239 (Admin)
Docket NumberCase No: CO/2123/2014
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
Date11 February 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Sardabai Mansukhlal Girdharlal Thakrar v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 19 September 2018
    ...Tribunal Judge had erred in law, in that only one outcome of the appeal was possible; namely, to allow it. 37 As Walker J held in R (G & H) v Upper Tribunal [2016] EWHC 239 (Admin) and as the Upper Tribunal has more recently pointed out in Shah (“ Cart” Judicial Review: Nature and Conseque......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2018-09-19, [2018] UKUT 336 (IAC) (Thakrar (Cart JR, Art 8, Value to Community))
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 19 September 2018
    ...in law, in that only one outcome of the appeal was possible; namely, to allow it. As Walker J held in R (G & H) v Upper Tribunal [2016] EWHC 239 (Admin) and as the Upper Tribunal has more recently pointed out in Shah (“Cart” Judicial Review: Nature and Consequences) [2018] UKUT 51 (IAC); [2......
  • EE's Application
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
    • 18 October 2017
    ...must apply to a failure within the tribunal system in the United Kingdom. I note that in the decision of Walker J in G &H v UT & SSHD [2016] EWHC 239 significant failures were apparent which resulted in a successful challenge to a permission refusal. This is not such a case. [31] The positi......
  • AW v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and AL (CSM)
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 2 June 2017
    ...The circumstances in which it is permissible to make a consent order were, though, considered by Walker J in R (G) v the Upper Tribunal [2016] 1 WLR 3417. He was speaking in the context of the judicial review jurisdiction, but his reasoning is equally applicable to consent orders by tribuna......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT