R GRAHAM FORD v BOARD of INLAND REVENUE PAULA SAYERS
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Neutral Citation | [2005] EWHC 1109 (Admin) |
Year | 2005 |
Date | 2005 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
MD v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...which is not means-tested, is not intended to cover a child's “subsistence needs”: Mr Buttler referred to R (Ford) v Inland Revenue [2005] EWHC 1109 (Admin) (per Richards J at para. 3); R (PO) v Council of the London Borough of Newham [2014] EWHC 2561 (Admin) (per Mr John Howell QC at par......
-
Humphreys v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
...allocate the benefit for one child to one household and for another child to the other: see R (Ford) v Board of Inland Revenue [2005] EWHC 1109 (Admin). 6 Entitlement to CTC depends upon making a claim: TCA, section 3(1). A claim may be made either jointly by a couple or by a single person......
-
JH v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and LH (CSM)
...one child to one parent and to the other parent for another child (see e.g. R (on the application of Ford) v Board of Inland Revenue [2005] EWHC Admin 1109). But there is no direct read across from one scheme to the 67. Second, the father argues that the children are already well provided f......
-
JH CCS 227 2016
...one child to one parent and to the other parent for another child (see e.g. R (on the application of Ford) v Board of Inland Revenue [2005] EWHC Admin 1109). But there is no direct read across from one scheme to the other. 67. Second, the father argues that the children are already well pro......
Request a trial to view additional results