R GRAHAM FORD v BOARD of INLAND REVENUE PAULA SAYERS

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
Neutral Citation[2005] EWHC 1109 (Admin)
Year2005
Date2005

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • MD v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 March 2022
    ...which is not means-tested, is not intended to cover a child's “subsistence needs”: Mr Buttler referred to R (Ford) v Inland Revenue [2005] EWHC 1109 (Admin) (per Richards J at para. 3); R (PO) v Council of the London Borough of Newham [2014] EWHC 2561 (Admin) (per Mr John Howell QC at para.......
  • Humphreys v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 16 May 2012
    ...allocate the benefit for one child to one household and for another child to the other: see R (Ford) v Board of Inland Revenue [2005] EWHC 1109 6 Entitlement to CTC depends upon making a claim: TCA, section 3(1). A claim may be made either jointly by a couple or by a single person who is no......
  • YT CIS 2457 2008
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 3 December 2008
    ...v Secretary of State for Social Security [2002] EWHC 1915 (Admin) and in R on the application of Ford v Board of Inland Revenue [2005] EWHC 1109 (Admin). At present, however, it appears that there has been no application to HMRC in connection with child benefit. A6. I also reiterate that an......
  • Humphreys CTC 2608 2008
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 16 May 2012
    ...allocate the benefit for one child to one household and for another child to the other: see R (Ford) v Board of Inland Revenue [2005] EWHC 1109 (Admin). 6. Entitlement to CTC depends upon making a claim: TCA, section 3(1). A claim may be made either jointly by a couple or by a single person......
  • Get Started for Free