R (HM Revenue and Customs) v Machell
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 21 November 2005 |
| Neutral Citation | [2005] EWHC 2593 (Admin) |
| Date | 21 November 2005 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
R v Islam
...the face value. The market value was clearly the face value." 11 In R (Revenue and Customs Comrs) v Machell [2005] EWHC 2593 (Admin); [2006] 1 WLR 609, para 29 Stanley Burnton J said that in this passage Lord Denning had excluded illegitimate transactions from the determination of market v......
-
The Queen (on the application of John David Andrews) v Secretary of State for Environment Food and Rural Affairs Wiltshire County Council and Another (Interested Parties)
...County Council or the Secretary of State. The analogy he seeks to draw with the case of R (Revenue and Customs Commissioners) v Machell [2006] 1 WLR 609 seems to me to be apt: see per Stanley Burnton J, as he then was, at [24]. Indeed, as Mr Moffett says, in any event the County Council and......
-
R. v. Islam, [2009] N.R. Uned. 196
...they all paid the face value. The market value was clearly the face value." [11] In R (Revenue and Customs Comrs) v. Machell [2005] EWHC 2593 (Admin); [2006] 1 W.L.R. 609, para. 29 Stanley Burnton, J., said that in this passage Lord Denning had excluded illegitimate transactions from t......
-
R v Hussain
...Engineering Holidays Scheme Management Ltd v Post Office [1966] 1 QB 247, and the decision of the Administrative Court in R(HM Revenue and Customs) v Machell [2005] EWHC 2593 (Admin). In our judgment, there is nothing in the Act or in authority to lead one to a contrary 13 The words "mark......
Request a trial to view additional results