R (Johnson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMR JUSTICE SULLIVAN
Judgment Date25 February 2004
Neutral Citation[2004] EWHC 1184 (Admin)
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
Docket NumberCO/165/2004
Date25 February 2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION

THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand London WC2

Before:

Mr Justice Sullivan

CO/165/2004

The Queen On The Application Of
Derrick Johnson\
(Claimant)
and
(1) The Secretary Of State For The Home Department
(2) The Parole Board
(Defendants)

MR KRIS GLEDHILL appeared on behalf of the CLAIMANT

MR ADAM ROBB appeared on behalf of the DEFENDANTS

Wednesday, 25th February 2004

MR JUSTICE SULLIVAN
1

Mr Gledhill, thank you very much for your note. It now explains why I am here, so far as this case is concerned. Now I know why I am here, what I am going to do, for the reasons we have just discussed, is to refuse this application for permission to apply for judicial review upon the basis that the remedy sought in the proceedings has, in fact, been granted. The Parole Board has reviewed the matter, the Claimant has been released and, if and insofar as the Claimant wishes to pursue the issue of damages, then that is not an amendment that would be successful in this Court in any event upon the authorities, and so it is a matter for you as to whether you renew the application for permission to apply for judicial...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • S v Secretary of State of the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 18 July 2007
    ...as between the parties. The Claimants also rely, however, upon a decision of Field J in Hanil El Sayed Sabaei Youssef v Home Office [2004] EWHC 1184 to the effect that the Court should judge the question of whether or not detention is lawful as a primary decision maker and not simply review......
  • R (Ahmed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 19 February 2010
    ...of the court in the light of those facts has been the subject of decision in the case of Haniel El Sayed Sabaei Yousef vs Home Office [2004] EWHC 1184 by Mr Justice Field, who expressed the view that the question of whether or not detention is lawful is to be judged by the court as a primar......