R (L and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 24 January 2003 |
| Neutral Citation | [2003] EWCA Civ 25 |
| Docket Number | Case No: C2/2002/2644/2645 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Date | 24 January 2003 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
136 cases
-
Biruk Habte v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...least one legitimate view of the facts or the law the claim may succeed, the claim will not be clearly unfounded": see R (L) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] 1 W.L.R. 1230 at paragraph 73 In applying that test, the court should take the claimant's claim at its reasonable......
-
R (on the Application of Weldegaber) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Dublin Returns - Italy) (IJR)
...guidance to the correct approach for the decision maker is contained in the decision of the Court of Appeal in R (L) v SSHD [2003] EWCA Civ 25. This contains the following notable formulation: “ If on at least one legitimate view of the facts or the law the claim may succeed, it will not be......
-
R Manjeet Kaur v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...the test which was enunciated by Lord Phillips, the then Master of the Rolls, in VL and ZL v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWCA Civ 25: see paragraphs 56 to 58 inclusive, to which I was taken by Ms Hirst, counsel for the claimant. 4 Second, it is also well established th......
-
Parmer v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...he succeeds in relation to both or only one of those claims. 7 The relevant tests are agreed as set out in the case of L v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] 1 WLR 1230, in particular paragraphs 56 and 57 of the judgment in that case. The case dealt with a previous section bu......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
How To Appeal A UK Visa Or Immigration Decision
...of the House of Lords in R v SSHD Ex p Thangarasa and R v SSHD, Ex p Yogathas [2002] UKHL 36 and Court of Appeal in ZL & VL v SSHD [2003] EWCA Civ 25 a manifestly unfounded claim is a claim which is so clearly without substance that it is bound to fail. A claim can be manifestly unfounded e......
-
Immigration Tribunal Appeals: A Practical Guide (1)
...Home Department, Ex p Yogathas [2002] UKHL 36 and ZL & VL v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Lord Chancellor's Department [2003] EWCA Civ 25 confirm that a manifestly unfounded claim is a claim which is so clearly without substance that it is bound to fail. A claim can be mani......