R (Morgan Grenfell & Company Ltd) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date08 November 2000
Date08 November 2000
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
46 cases
  • B v Auckland District Law Society
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 19 Mayo 2003
    ...was authoritatively stated by Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough in R (Morgan Grenfell & Co Ltd) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax [2002] 2 WLR 1299, which is the most recent English decision on legal professional privilege. He said at p 1131: "A necessary implication is not the same as a rea......
  • Criminal Assets Bureau v Ms. N. McE
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 31 Julio 2007
    ... ... paid by means of payment from a finance company which was arranged through AIB and the balance in ... that the Defendant had little, if any, income available to her from her own resources over and ... ...
  • R (Morgan Grenfell & Company Ltd) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 16 Mayo 2002
  • R (Morgan Grenfell & Company Ltd) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 2 Marzo 2001
    ...privilege. 2 In issue before the Divisional Court were four questions which the court formulated in the following terms (at para 8 of [2000] STC 965): "I. Does s20(1) of the 1970 Act authorise an inspector to issue a notice requiring disclosure by a taxpayer of material subject to legal pro......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
2 books & journal articles
  • R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union: Three Competing Syllogisms
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 80-4, July 2017
    • 1 Julio 2017
    ...41 Federal Law Review 363.34 McCord (HC) n 4 above at [81]-[84], citing R (Morgan Grenfell & Co Ltd) vSpecial Commissionerof Income Tax[2002] 2 WLR 1299 at [45] per Lord Hobhouse and De Keyser n 10 above, 526 perLord Dunedin, 539 per Lord Atkinson.35 What is more, it was only the Acts of 19......
  • An overview of the anti‐money laundering laws of Hong Kong
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Money Laundering Control No. 11-4, October 2008
    • 17 Octubre 2008
    ...1 January 2003.34. Section 2 OSCO; section 2 DTO.35. See R (Morgan Grenfell & Co Ltd) v. Special Commissioner of Income Tax and Another[2002] 2 WLR 1299 per Lord Hoffmann at 1032. However, in Ordre des barreauxfrancophones et germanophone (Association of the French-speaking and German-speak......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT