R (Newcastle United Football Club Ltd Newcastle United Ltd Newcastle United Football Company Ltd) v The Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs (First Defendant) The Crown Court at Leeds (Second Defendant)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | Lord Justice Beatson,Mrs Justice Whipple |
Judgment Date | 04 October 2017 |
Neutral Citation | [2017] EWHC 2402 (Admin) |
Docket Number | Case No: CO/2300/2017 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
Date | 04 October 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Business Energy Solutions Ltd v The Crown Court at Preston
...having regard to the observations” in Cook and Cummins. 67 R (Newcastle United Football Club) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2017] EWHC 2402 (Admin) , was also concerned with copies taken pursuant to an unlawful search. The Court emphasised the broad supervisory power of the Crown Co......
-
1) David Hart and Others v 1) The Crown Court at Blackfriars and Another
...Transport Police [2013] EWHC 2189 (Admin), [2014] 1 WLR 1647, and in R (Newcastle United Football Club Limited and others) v HMRC [2017] EWHC 2402 (Admin), [2017] 4 WLR 187. Those cases establish that the subparagraph refers to the belief of the officer making the application at the time ......
-
Hardip Singh aka Peter Virdee v The National Crime Agency
...rise to that belief should be put before the judge: see R (Newcastle United FC and others) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2017] EWHC 2402 (Admin), [2017] 4 WLR 187 at paragraphs 66–70, in which the court noted that the Committee had considered whether to recommend that primary docume......
-
The Queen (on the application of Suleyman Javadov and Izzat Khanim Javadov) v Westminster Magistrates' Court
...the grant of the AFOs (see Regina (Newcastle Football Club Ltd and others) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners and another [2017] EWHC 2402 (Admin); [2017] 4 WLR 187). I would stress that nothing was said by the judge to indicate that he had concluded that he had no jurisdiction to sit in......
Request a trial to view additional results