R (on the application of Lupepe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Mr Justice Lewis |
| Judgment Date | 30 October 2017 |
| Neutral Citation | [2017] EWHC 2690 (Admin) |
| Docket Number | CO/87/2017 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
| Date | 30 October 2017 |
Between:
Lupepe
Claimant
and
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant
[2017] EWHC 2690 (Admin)
Before:
Mr Justice Lewis
CO/87/2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
Royal Courts of Justice
APPEARANCES
THE CLAIMANT was not present and was not represented.
THE DEFENDANT was not present and was not represented.
1
For the reasons in the written judgment which I now hand down, this claim for judicial review is allowed. The requirement that the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
The Queen (on the application of Ibrahima Jollah) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2)
...(Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2) [2016] Q.B. 789 (on appeal to the Supreme Court) and R (Lupepe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2690 (Admin). In other words, the defendant would have failed to establish that a curfew could be imposed a......
-
R HS v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...the 4 February 2006 notice 61 C4.4 S: submissions and analysis 62 C5 Court of Appeal decision in AR (Pakistan) 63 C6 High Court decision in Lupepe 65 C7 High Court decision in Gafurov 68 C8 Conclusion on JR ground 1 69 C8.1 Three different contexts 69 C8.2 Disobeying or interfering with the......
-
R (on the application of SHOTE) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...by AR (Pakistan), which was accordingly followed in R (Tracey) v SSHD [2017] EWHC 1327 (Admin) at §§51–52; and in R (Lupepe) v SSHD [2017] EWHC 2690 (Admin) at §52. 36 As Longmore LJ (for the Court of Appeal) explained in AR (Pakistan) at §26: “paragraph 22 [of Schedule 2] … authorises a ch......
-
Idealing.com Ltd v Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd
...claimant relies upon paragraph 48.1.12 of the Judicial Review Handbook (7th edn), which in turn cites Lewis J in R (Lupepe) v SSHD [2017] EWHC 2690 (Admin); 10 WLUK 688: “material parts of the policy guidance applied by the defendant's official in reviewing the curfew imposed in the claima......
Request a trial to view additional results