R (on the application of Taj) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2021] EWCA Civ 19
Year2021
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • R (TJ Trading Express Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 22 May 2025
    ...by the decision-maker before considering any representations from the affected person. Similarly, in Taj v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 19 [2021] 1 WLR 1850, the Court of Appeal discussed the “absence of a pointlessness (materiality/utility) test” in cases invo......
  • Ahmad Zarrin Ghadam, R (on the application of) v Secretary Of State For The Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 12 July 2024
    ...ignored the legal principles that any “Doody” duty of fairness was attenuated in points-based system cases, as confirmed in R (Taj) v SSHD [2021] EWCA Civ 19; [2021] Imm AR 748. In terms of any suggestion that the Applicant would have been unprepared to answer questions, he must have known,......
  • The King (on the application of Musarat Bibi) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 13 May 2025
    ...to communicate evolving concerns about truthfulness, see R (Taj) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 19; [2021] 1 WLR 1850, (“ Taj”) particularly at [73]. ii) This particular allegation did not have far-reaching or serious consequences in the same way as a decision ......
  • R (TJ Trading Express Limited) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 22 May 2025
    ...by the decision-maker before considering any representations from the affected person. Similarly, in Taj v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 19 [2021] 1 WLR 1850, the Court of Appeal discussed the “absence of a pointlessness (materiality/utility) test” in cases invo......
  • Get Started for Free