R (Saadi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
Neutral Citation[2001] EWHC 670 (Admin)
Date2001
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 cases
  • R (Faulkner) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • Invalid date
  • R (Nadarajah) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 2 December 2002
    ...grounds for suspecting that he is someone in respect of whom removal directions may be given: c.f. R (on the application of Saadi and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] UKHL 41. Detention may then be authorised pending a decision to give such directions and his rem......
  • R Detention Action v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 December 2014
    ......Those statements and documents are set out or summarised in section III below. Before turning to them, it is necessary to refer to the introduction of the DFT process and to the decision of the House of Lords in R (Saadi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] UKHL 41 , [2002] 1 WLR 3131 . The DFT process was first introduced in 2000 because of the large number of applications for asylum. Ouseley J's main judgment at [25] – [67] contains a clear account of the reasons for introducing it, the ......
  • A, X and Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department [Court of Appeal (Civil Division).]
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 October 2002
    ...they are present or resident in the state (see Chahal at paragraph 73 and R (Saadi) v. Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentUNK [2001] 4 All ER 961 at 990 fj, per Lord Phillips MR). The submission is that immigration control inevitably involves differential treatment between United Kin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT