R v Ali and Hussain; and R v Stewart

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1965
Year1965
CourtCentral Criminal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Dill v R
    • Bermuda
    • Court of Appeal (Bermuda)
    • 19 March 2012
    ...Mr C Mahoney for the Respondent The following cases were referred to in the judgment: R v Sang [1979] UKHL 3 R v Ali and HussainUNK (1965) 49 Cr App R 230 Dearing v RBDLR [1986] Bda LR 27 R v MurphyDNI [1965] NI 138 R v Bailey and SmithUNK (1993) 97 Cr App R 365 Abstract: Murder - Appeal ag......
  • Phillips v The Queen
    • Barbados
    • Court of Appeal (Barbados)
    • 30 June 1989
    ...have been excluded and criticises the learned judge for not giving his reasons for not excluding them. He refers to R. v. Stewart (1972) 56 Cr. App. R. 272, R. v. Kilner [1976] Crim. L.R. 740 and The Queen v. Williams [1959] N.Z.L.R. 502 and submits that this court should rule that the stat......
  • The Queen v Nguyen Van Truong
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 3 May 1991
    ...to guilt, but admits a number of previous convictions by the defendant; and see R. v. Isequilla [1975] 1 All ER 77 and. R. v. Steward [1972] 56 Cr App R 272. It was argued oh behalf of the appellant that the judge should have considered Whether the circumstances of the recording of the stat......
  • The Queen v Vu Duc Hoa
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 3 May 1991
    ...to guilt, but admits a number of previous convictions by the defendant; and see R. v. Isequilla [1975] 1 All ER 77 and. R. v. Steward [1972] 56 Cr App R 272. It was argued oh behalf of the appellant that the judge should have considered Whether the circumstances of the recording of the stat......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • ADMISSIBILITY AND THE DISCRETION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...English courts on the basis of prejudicial effect resulting from the accused person's mental disability. For example, see R v Stewart(1972) 56 Cr App R 272. 113 See paras 25–28 below. 114 See para 9 above. 115[1990] 2 SLR(R) 39. See also Muhammad bin Kadar v Public Prosecutor[2011] 3 SLR 12......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT