R v Allsopp and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Gage |
| Judgment Date | 17 March 2005 |
| Neutral Citation | [2005] EWCA Crim 703 |
| Docket Number | Case No:200303312 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 17 March 2005 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
R v Fulton & Others (No. 4) - Ruling on Authorisations
...the transcripts were obtained. It is open to them to cross-examine the officers who actually obtained the recordings (see R.v. Alsopp [2005] EWCA Crim 703 at [28]), and to challenge the authenticity and integrity of the recordings, as in Templar at [7]. The protection for the defendants Art......
-
R v Francis Kennedy and Gordon Alee and John Morris
...the feet of the applicants by two decisions of this court. The first such is R v E [2004] 2 Cr.App 29. Additionally, there is R v Allsopp [2005] EWCA Crim 703. In the result, both applicants realistically contract their initial submissions so as to concentrate on so much of the ruling as re......
-
Attorney General's Reference (Nos. 66 and 67 of 2006); R v Cuscani and Others
...are plainly responsible for the wider range of dealings which are carried out by others as part of the overall operation. R v Allsopp and Others [2005] EWCA Crim 703, to which we have been referred, is a good example of just such a case. On the other hand, virtually every joint offence is a......
-
R v Austin (Steve) and Dutton (Thomas)
...factors: (a) Dutton's good character; (b) there was only one delivery by Dutton; and he has drawn our attention to a case called Allsopp [2005] EWCA Crim 703, with reference to a man called Hazel. We do not find that authority of any assistance in this case. 11 We now state our conclusion. ......
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...App R 16 208 R v Adams [1980] QB 575, [1980] 3 WLR 275, [1980] 1 All ER 473, CA 222 R v Allen [1992] Crim LR 297, CA 224 R v Allsopp [2005] EWCA Crim 703, (2005) 149 SJLB 388 120 R v Anderson [1972] 1 QB 304, [1971] 3 WLR 939, [1971] 3 All ER 1152, CA 165, 255 R v Astrid Curzon, 17 August 2......
-
Offences Involving Communications
...lawful for all purposes. 120 Cyber Crime: Law and Practice In R v E [2004] EWCA Crim 1243, [2004] 1 WLR 3279, followed in R v Allsopp [2005] EWCA Crim 703, the Court of Appeal explained the scope of the offence of interception, then contrary to section 1 of the RIPA 2000. It was ruled that ......
-
Intercepting Communications ‘In Accordance with the Law’
...are em-powered to resort to such measures. The law in question should state25 See also Rv Smart and Beard [2002] EWCA Crim 272.26 [2005] EWCA Crim 703, (2005) 149 SJLB 388.27 Ibid. at [44].28 Home Office, Interception of Communications Code of Practice (2002), available at http://www.homeo......