R v Ameer and Lucas
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 1977 |
| Year | 1977 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
9 cases
-
R v Sang (on Appeal from HM Court of Appeal (Criminal Division))
...was not a case of entrapment. Moreover there had also been a recent decision at the Central Criminal Court ( Reg. v. Ameer & Lucas [1977] Crim.L.R. 104) in a case which did involve an agent provocateur where Judge Gilles, after a lengthy trial within a trial, had exercised his discretio......
-
R v Sang
...its case – see, for example, the ruling of His Honour Judge Gillis on 30th July, 1976, briefly reported in (1977) C.L.R. 104 in Ameer and Lucas. The making of this concession does not appear from that report, but we have a transcript of the learned judge's ruling and the making of the conce......
-
Maycock et Al v Commissioner of Police
...upon which in the last resort all judges have to rely: but any extension of the discretion, such as occurred in Reg v. Ameer and Lucas [1977] Crim LR 104 - to which my noble and learned friends, Lord Diplock and Viscount Dilhorne, have referred with disapproval - would also undermine the ju......
-
R v Looseley
...a defence, in some cases judges excluded evidence in entrapment cases: R v Foulder [1973] Crim LR 45, R v Burnett [1973] Crim LR 748 and R v Ameer [1977] Crim LR 104. Entrapment was regarded as a mitigating factor in, for instance, R v McCann (1971) 56 Cr App R 8 In R v Sang [1980] AC 40......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Recent Judicial Decisions
...had agreed to be examinedand at the trial the doctor had given evidence of unfitness. Theconviction was quashed. Recently in R. v.Ameer[1977]Crim. L.R.104 evidence was excluded because the offence had been broughtabout with the help of an agent provocateur. Despite this the trialjudge in Sa......