R v Bainbridge

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1959
Date1959
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
42 cases
  • Giorgianni v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • R v Maxwell (Note)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • October 19, 1978
    ...probabilities that a bomb was to be placed in the bar (Count 1.) and that the Cortina was carrying it (Count 2.) 23I do not agree. In Reg. v. Bainbridge [1960] 1 Q.B. 129 Bainbridge was convicted of being an accessory before the fact to office breaking. A bank had been broken into and oxyg......
  • Nomura Taiji and Others v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • January 19, 1998
    ...out in order to facilitate the commission of the offence and did in fact facilitate the commission thereof. 122.In R v Bainbridge [1960] 1 QB 129, a bank was broken into by means of oxygen cutting equipment. It was later found that the equipment had been purchased by the appellant some six ......
  • The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v Dekker
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • June 16, 2015
    ...R. 216. R. v. Badza [2009] EWCA Crim. 2695, (Unreported, Court of Appeal of England and Wales, 15 December 2009). Regina v. Bainbridge [1960] 1 Q.B. 129; [1959] 3 W.L.R. 656; [1959] 3 All E.R. 200; (1959) 43 Cr. App. R. 194. R. v. Carpenter [2011] EWCA Crim. 2568, [2012] Q.B. 722; [2012] 2 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 books & journal articles
  • Placing bankers in the front line: the secondary liability of bankers for their customers’ regulatory contravent
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Financial Crime No. 12-3, July 2005
    • July 1, 2005
    ...if the defendant gives no evidence of his state ofmind: p. 684D-684E.(73) Discussed at length in KJM Smith, Chs 6 ±8.(74) See Bainbridge [1960] 1 QB 129, pp. 133±34 per Lord ParkerCJ and, more recently, DPP for Northern Ireland v Maxwell[1978] 1 WLR 1350 (HL).(75) For example, to induce a b......
  • The Contribution of Complicity
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 86-6, December 2022
    • December 1, 2022
    ...779.100. JC Smith, ‘Aid, Abet, Counsel or Procure’in PR Glazebrook (ed) Reshaping the Criminal Law (1978), 134.101. R v Bainbridge [1960] 1 QB 129 (CCA).102. R v Betts and Ridley (1931) 22 Cr App R 148 (CCA).Dyson 409 counselling occurs before the offence takes place. Since it is no longer ......
  • The Contribution of Complicity
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 86-6, December 2022
    • December 1, 2022
    ...779.100. JC Smith, ‘Aid, Abet, Counsel or Procure’in PR Glazebrook (ed) Reshaping the Criminal Law (1978), 134.101. R v Bainbridge [1960] 1 QB 129 (CCA).102. R v Betts and Ridley (1931) 22 Cr App R 148 (CCA).Dyson 409 counselling occurs before the offence takes place. Since it is no longer ......
  • Reform of Anglo-American Complicity Law: Conduct, Connectivity and Comparative Solutions
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 86-6, December 2022
    • December 1, 2022
    ...111: ‘On this analysis (inHughes), causation requirements in the criminal law are intimately bound up with fault’.345. See Bainbridge [1960] 1 Q.B. 129, and see State v Tazwell, 30 La Ann. 894 (1878) (though the burglar did not use the toolsgiven by another the other would be liable as an a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT