R v Barnard

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtHigh Court
Judgment Date03 March 1837
Date03 March 1837

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • State (Quinn) v Ryan
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1966
  • Zhang & Anor v Yu
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 27 August 2018
    ...Corporation [2007] 1 NZLR 608 (CA) at [47]. Buxton v the Birches Tiem Share Resort Ltd [1991] 2 NZLR 641 (CA) at 646. R v Barnard (1837) 7 C & P 784, 173 ER That the money Ms Zhang invested in Finawin would be transmitted to New Zealand for investment by Finawin in New Zealand’s foreign exc......
  • Gill v M'Dowell
    • Ireland
    • King's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 30 October 1902
    ...question submitted for our decision. J. G. T. (1) Before Lord O'Brien, L.C.J., and Gibson, Madden, and Boyd, JJ. (1) 1 Stark. 434. (2) 7 C. & P. 784. (3) 3 Campb. 506. (4) L. R. 6 Q. B. 597. (5) 4 A. C. 13. (6) L. R. 6 Q. B. at p. 603 (1) L. R. 6 Q. B. 597 (1) L. R. 6 Q. B. 597. (1) 4 A. C.......
  • R v Samuel Hudson, John Smith and John Dewhirst
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1860
    ...Price. That count charges a conspiracy to obtain the money by false pretences. At the trial the case was likened to that of Rex v. Bernard (7 Car. & P. 784), where a person at Oxford, who was not a member of the University, [267] went for the purpose of fraud, wearing a commoner's gown and ......
  • Get Started for Free