R v Barrell

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1979
Year1979
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
42 cases
  • DPP v Nevin
    • Ireland
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 14 Marzo 2003
    ...where later offences would not have been committed but for the prior commission of an earlier offence — see R v. Barrell and Wilson [1979] 69 CR. App. R250 C.A. in which the Court of Appeal - Shaw L.J. held (at pp 252—3) 56 "The phrase "founded on the same facts" does not mean that for char......
  • R v Roberts (Patrice)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 18 Junio 2008
    ...the guns and the drugs. They merely happened to have been discovered at the same time on the same premises. 8 The next case is R v Barrell and Wilson (1979) 69 Cr. App. R. 250. In that case the indictment contained counts of affray and assault against both appellants, and a count against Wi......
  • R v Simon Austin Hamilton
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 16 Agosto 2007
    ... ... 42 The appellant contended before the judge that the counts of outraging public decency should not have been joined in the same indictment as they were neither founded on the same facts nor were part of a series of offences of the same or similar character. Applying the test in Barrell and Wilson (1979) 69 Cr App R 620 , the charges did not have a common factual origin; the only connecting link was that they were discovered at the same search of the appellant's house; otherwise they covered different periods of time and the subjects of the counts of outraging public decency ... ...
  • Ross v DPP
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 30 Septiembre 2020
    ...later offences would not have been committed but for the prior commission of an earlier offence — see Reg. v. Barrell and Wilson (1979) 69 Cr. App. R 250 in which the Court of Appeal per Shaw L.J. held at pp 252 and 253 that:- ‘The phrase “founded on the same facts” does not mean that for ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT