R v Barry C
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Judge |
| Judgment Date | 18 March 2004 |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] EWCA Crim 292 |
| Date | 18 March 2004 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | Case No: 200203147 D4 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
- National Westminster Bank Plc v Spectrum Plus Ltd and Others
-
PGA v The Queen
...13 [66] per Doyle CJ. 280 [1992] 1 AC 599: see above at [103]. 281 SW v United Kingdom (1995) 21 EHRR 363 at 402 [43/41]. 282 Cf R v C [2004] 1 WLR 2098; [2004] 3 All ER 1, dealing with conduct in 1970 — a case exemplifying to a very marked degree the fallacy known to personal injury law......
5 books & journal articles
-
The Need to Kill Off Zombie Law
...and that such decisionsmight or might not have retrospective effect,93although there is a presumption that decisions will take86. RvC[2004] EWCA Crim 292; [2004] 1 WLR 2098 [10]–[17].87. Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234; (1986) 83 Cr App R 191 HL (and applicable to ......
-
Conspiracy: Marital Exemption and Polygamy
...at some point prior to 1970 when Cforced his wife into sexual intercourse for which he was convicted in 2002: RvC[2004] EWCA Crim292; [2004] 1 WLR 2098.The point of course is that a wife long ago ceased to be the property of her husband, and acquired thestatus in law of an autonomous indivi......
-
Legality and Reality: Some Lessons from the Pitcairn Islands
...they 61 R v R (Rape: Marital Exemption) [1991] 2 All ER 257.62 CR v United Kingdom [1996] 1 FLR 434 at [41].63 Ibid. at [42].64 R v C [2004] 3 All ER 1, Legality and Reality: Some Lessons from the Pitcairn Islands would have to say that if he raped his wife he would not be committinga crimi......
-
The Doctrine of Precedent and the Provocation Defence: A Comment on R v James
...per Lord Reid.31 [1992] 1AC 599.32 SeeT.Rees and A. Ashworth,‘Rape:Husband Convicted of RapingWife Before1992 ^ Whetheran O¡ence’ [2005]Crim LR 238.33 The European Court of Human Rights adopted this reasoning in SWa nd CRvUnited Kingdom(1995) 21EHRR 363.It also held that the decision in RvR......
Request a trial to view additional results