R v Barton
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1972 |
| Year | 1972 |
| Court | Crown Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
25 cases
-
R v Derby Magistrates' Court, ex parte B
...of legal professional privilege there is no hint of any such exercise having been performed prior to the decision of Caulfield J. in Reg. v. Barton [1973] 1 W.L.R. 115. So it will be necessary to look briefly at the history of the privilege, and then to consider the underlying principles o......
-
JP Morgan Multi-Strategy Fund LP v Macro Fund Ltd
...dicta of Lord Halsbury, L.C. considered. (34) R. v. Ataou, [1988] Q.B. 798; [1988] 2 All E.R. 321, referred to. (35) R. v. Barton, [1973] 1 W.L.R. 115; [1972] 2 All E.R. 1192, referred to. (36) R. v. Derby Magistrates” Court, ex p. B, ELR[1996] A.C. 487; [1995] 4 All E.R. 526, dicta of Lord......
-
S v Safatsa and Others
...(1979) 53 B ALJR 11 at 21 - 4, 28; Baker v Campbell (1984) 49 ALR 385 at 395; R v Richardson 3 F & F 693 (176 ER 318); R v Barton [1972] 2 All ER 1192; Wigmore on Evidence vol 8 paras 2291, 2292; Glanville Williams Textbook of Criminal Law (1978) at 338; S v Smith 1984 (1) SA 583 (A) at 596......
-
Scc v B
...4 All ER 702, [1994] 2 WLR 407, [1993] 2 FLR 826. R v Ataou [1988] QB 798, [1988] 2 All ER 321, [1988] 2 WLR 1147, CA. R v Barton [1972] 2 All ER 1192, [1973] 1 WLR 115. R v Derby Magistrates’ Court, ex p B [1996] AC 487, [1995] 4 All ER 526, [1995] 3 WLR 681, [1996] 1 FLR 513, HL. Saxton (......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
NEW TWISTS IN LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE: COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF LITIGATION AND BETWEEN THE LAWYER AND CLIENT
...on the issue of the absoluteness of litigation privilege which will be considered in the main text from note 170. 80 [1996] AC 487. 81 [1973] 1 WLR 115 82 Ibid, at 118. 83 [1988] 2 All ER 321. 84 Ibid, at 807 (citing R v Craig[1975] 1 NZLR 597). 85 The court stated that although the disclos......
-
REFLECTIONS ON S 2(2) OF SINGAPORE EVIDENCE ACT AND ROLE OF COMMON LAW RULES OF EVIDENCE
...and the Litigation Process (LexisNexis, 6th Ed, 2017) at paras 14.075–14.082. 193 See, eg, R v McClure[2001] SCR 445. 194 In R v Barton[1973] 1 WLR 115. 195 See paras 49–50 above. 196[1999] 1 SLR(R) 1165 at [53]–[61]. 197Public Prosecutor v Knight Glenn Jeyasingam[1999] 1 SLR(R) 1165 at [60......
-
ADMISSIBILITY, PRIVILEGE AND THE EXPUNGING OF EVIDENCE
...of criminals (Butler v Board of Trade, supra, note 34; R v Tompkins(1977) 67 Cr App R 181) and the protection of the innocent (R v Barton[1973] 1 WLR 115). 73 My excuse for making such a bald proposition is that to persuade readers of it would require much more space and time. Suffice to sa......