R v Bashir
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE WATKINS |
| Judgment Date | 22 February 1982 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1982] EWCA Crim J0222-1 |
| Docket Number | 3600/C1/81 |
| Date | 22 February 1982 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
7 cases
-
DPP v Michael McDonagh
...1991). The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v. Rock (Unreported, Court of Criminal Appeal, 29th July, 1993). R. v. Bashir (1982) 77 Cr. App. R. 59. R. v. Haughian (1985) 80 Cr. App. R. 334. R. v. Taylor (1985) 80 Cr. App. R. 327. United States v. American Trucking Associations (1939......
-
Neville v Public Prosecutor
... ... Counsel also referred us to a series of mainly English decisions on the consequences of a non-consideration or improper consideration of a possible legal defence. They were: R v Sheaf ,6 R v Kachikwu ,7 Bullard v R ,8 R v Porritt ,9 R v Cascoe ,10 R v Bashir ,11 R v Badjan ,12 and R v Baillie-Smith .13 In Bullard ,8 the accused raised the defences of self-defence and provocation to a charge of murder. The jury rejected the defence of self-defence, and the judge had withdrawn the issue of provocation from the jury on the ground that the ... ...
- R v Satnam S
-
R v Taylor (Robert)
...19 We have been referred to three specific cases where it has been held that such a direction was necessary. The first is the case of Bashir (1983) 77 Cr. App. S. 59. If the facts in that case are examined closely, it will be seen that the girl apparently actively assisted the defendant to ......
Get Started for Free
