R v Beale
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court for Crown Cases Reserved |
| Year | 1865 |
| Date | 1865 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
CC v Ireland
...Prosecutions) v. N.Y. [2002] 4 I.R. 309. Queen v. Peters [1956] V.L.R. 73. Proudman v. Dayman (1941) 67 C.L.R. 536. R. v. Beale (1865) L.R. 1 C.C.R. 10. Reg. v. Booth (1872) 12 Cox C.C. 231. R. v. City of Sault Sainte Marie [1978] 2 S.C.R. 1299; (1978) 85 DLR 161. R. v. Forbes (1865) 10 Cox......
-
C.C. v Ireland, Attorney General, and DPP v P.G. v Ireland, Attorney General, and DPP
...3 IR 390 DPP v S (M) 2003 1 IR 606 DPP v Y (N) 2002 4 IR 309 Queen v Peters 1956 VLR 73 Proudman v Dayman 1941 67 CLR 536 R v Beale 1865 LR 1 CCR 10 Reg v Booth 1872 12 Cox CC 231 R v City of Sault Sainte Marie 1978 2 SCR 1299 1978 85 DLR 161 R v Forbes 1865 10 Cox CC 362 R v Forde 1923 2......
- PP v Selvarajah
-
Attorney General (Shaughnessy) v Ryan (Cormack)
... ... Notable amongst these was the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1885. The section under consideration and similar provisions of earlier Acts were designed to protect young girls, not alone against lustful men, but against themselves. Mr. Clarke has referred to the case of R. v. Beale(1),which was a charge of attempting to have carnal knowledge of a girl under the age of 10 years contrary to 24 and 25 Vict., c. 100, s. 52. Pollock C.B., said:—"The learned Judge who tried the case seems to have thought that a full and ample consent on the part of the girl would have prevented ... ...
