R v Board of Inland Revenue, ex parte Goldberg

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
Judgment Date28 April 1988
Date28 April 1988

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Dubai Bank Ltd v Galadari
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 October 1989
    ... ... 561 , D.C. and Waugh v. British Railways Board [ 1980 ] A.C. 521 , H.L.(E.) applied ... The ... 702 , C.A. distinguished ... Reg. v. Board of Inland Revenue, Ex parte Goldberg [ 1989 ] Q.B. 267 , D.C ... ...
  • Tromso Sparebank v Beirne (No. 2)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1989
    ... ... referred me to a recent decision in R, V Board of Inland Revenue, Ex Parte Goldberg (1988) 3 All E. 248, ... ...
  • Power City Ltd v Monahan Shipping
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 14 October 1996
    ...IR 289 SPAREBANK V BEIRNE & ORS (NO 2) 1989 ILRM 257 BUTTES GAS & OIL CO V HAMMER 1981 QB 223 R V BOARD OF INLAND REVENUE SP GOLDBERG 1988 3 WLR 522 ALFRED CROMPTON AMUSEMENT MACHINES LTD V CUSTOMS & EXCISE COMMISSIONERS (NO 2) 1972 2 QB 102 1 Judgment of Mr. Justice Kinlendelivered the ......
  • Graham Brown and Another v Maurice Bennett and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 18 December 2001
    ...clients. 94 So far as more recent authorities are concerned, I refer first to the decision of the Divisional Court in R. v. Board of Inland Revenue, Ex parte Goldberg [1989] Q.B.267. That case suggests that the principle in Lyell v. Kennedy (or explained in Ventouris [1991] 1 W.L.R.607 at 6......
1 books & journal articles
  • Electronic discovery issues: disclosure requirements in Britain, Canada, and Australia.
    • United States
    • Defense Counsel Journal Vol. 65 No. 2, April 1998
    • 1 April 1998
    ...& Co. (Shipbuilders and Engineers), [1959] 1 W.L.R. 702, [1959] 2 All E.R. 757; and R. v. Bd. of Inland Revenue ex parte Goldberg, [1989] Q.B. 267. (37.) STYLE & HOLLANDER, DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE (FT Law & Tax. London, 6th ed.). (38.) (1997) 141 A.L.R. 545. (39.) Hodgkinson v. Sim......