R v Board of Inland Revenue, ex parte Goldberg
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 28 April 1988 |
Date | 28 April 1988 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Dubai Bank Ltd v Galadari
...with the view expressed by the Divisional Court of the Queen's Bench Division in a judgment delivered by Watkins L.J. in R v. Inland Revenue, Ex p. Goldberg [1989] Q.B.267. It is also necessary to consider the position on the facts. 4 The basis of this privilege on grounds of law goes back ......
-
Graham Brown and Another v Maurice Bennett and Others
...clients. 94 So far as more recent authorities are concerned, I refer first to the decision of the Divisional Court in R. v. Board of Inland Revenue, Ex parte Goldberg [1989] Q.B.267. That case suggests that the principle in Lyell v. Kennedy (or explained in Ventouris [1991] 1 W.L.R.607 at 6......
-
No Limits Sportswear Inc. v. 0912139 B.C. Ltd. et al., 2014 BCSC 999
...particularly helpful. Lastly, he referred to a passage from R. v. Bd. of Inland Revenue ; Ex parte Goldberg , [1988] 2 W.L.R. 522, [1988] 3 All E.R. 248 (Q.B.) where he quotes at 141: But in this case we are concerned with copy documents which, on the evidence, came into existence for the p......
-
Tromso Sparebank v Beirne (No. 2)
... ... referred me to a recent decision in R, V Board of Inland Revenue, Ex Parte Goldberg (1988) 3 All E. 248, ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Electronic discovery issues: disclosure requirements in Britain, Canada, and Australia.
...& Co. (Shipbuilders and Engineers), [1959] 1 W.L.R. 702, [1959] 2 All E.R. 757; and R. v. Bd. of Inland Revenue ex parte Goldberg, [1989] Q.B. 267. (37.) STYLE & HOLLANDER, DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE (FT Law & Tax. London, 6th ed.). (38.) (1997) 141 A.L.R. 545. (39.) Hodgkinson v. Sim......