R v Board of Inland Revenue, ex parte Goldberg

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date28 April 1988
Date28 April 1988
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Dubai Bank Ltd v Galadari
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 October 1989
    ...with the view expressed by the Divisional Court of the Queen's Bench Division in a judgment delivered by Watkins L.J. in R v. Inland Revenue, Ex p. Goldberg [1989] Q.B.267. It is also necessary to consider the position on the facts. 4 The basis of this privilege on grounds of law goes back ......
  • Graham Brown and Another v Maurice Bennett and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 18 December 2001
    ...clients. 94 So far as more recent authorities are concerned, I refer first to the decision of the Divisional Court in R. v. Board of Inland Revenue, Ex parte Goldberg [1989] Q.B.267. That case suggests that the principle in Lyell v. Kennedy (or explained in Ventouris [1991] 1 W.L.R.607 at 6......
  • No Limits Sportswear Inc. v. 0912139 B.C. Ltd. et al., 2014 BCSC 999
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 5 June 2014
    ...particularly helpful. Lastly, he referred to a passage from R. v. Bd. of Inland Revenue ; Ex parte Goldberg , [1988] 2 W.L.R. 522, [1988] 3 All E.R. 248 (Q.B.) where he quotes at 141: But in this case we are concerned with copy documents which, on the evidence, came into existence for the p......
  • Tromso Sparebank v Beirne (No. 2)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1989
    ... ... referred me to a recent decision in R, V Board of Inland Revenue, Ex Parte Goldberg (1988) 3 All E. 248, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Electronic discovery issues: disclosure requirements in Britain, Canada, and Australia.
    • United States
    • Defense Counsel Journal Vol. 65 No. 2, April 1998
    • 1 April 1998
    ...& Co. (Shipbuilders and Engineers), [1959] 1 W.L.R. 702, [1959] 2 All E.R. 757; and R. v. Bd. of Inland Revenue ex parte Goldberg, [1989] Q.B. 267. (37.) STYLE & HOLLANDER, DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE (FT Law & Tax. London, 6th ed.). (38.) (1997) 141 A.L.R. 545. (39.) Hodgkinson v. Sim......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT