R v Brisac

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1803
Year1803
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • DPP v Doot
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • March 21, 1973
    ...cannabis, to show that there was then within the jurisdiction a conspiracy to import cannabis resin to which they were parties. 34In R. v. Brisac (1803) 4 East 165: 102 E.R. 792, where the captain and purser of a man-of-war were charged with conspiracy to cheat the Crown by the use of false......
  • Public Prosecutor v Abdul Rashid and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • September 7, 1993
    ...averment that the abetment took place in Malaysia, courts in Singapore had no jurisdiction to try this matter. In R v Brisac and Scott [1803] 4 East 164[] 102 ER 794 the court in England had to deal with the question as respects jurisdiction in conspiracy. The court held that although the a......
  • AG v Garland
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • January 27, 2012
    ...DPP v DOOT & ORS 1973 AC 807 1973 2 WLR 532 1973 1 AER 940 R v BEST & ORS 91 ER 160 1705 1 SALK 174 R v BRISAC & SCOTT 102 ER 792 1803 4 EAST 164 R v BOWES UNREP 30.5.1787 (TRANSCRIPT NOT AVAILABLE) R v STONE 101 ER 684 1796 6 TERM REP 527 R v HARDY & ORS 1794 24 ST TR 199 R v HORNE TOOKE 1......
  • Pinkstone v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • May 20, 2004
    ...such death should not be punished in him, it would go unpunished’. 99 Foster's Crown Law (1762) at 349. 100 As in R v Brisac and Scott (1803) 4 East 164 at 172 [102 ER 792 at 796]: ‘And in the present case, the delivering the vouchers, and the presenting the bill of exchange to the Commiss......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT