R v Burnett
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1973 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
R v Sang (on Appeal from HM Court of Appeal (Criminal Division))
...of serious charges. A similar course was taken in Reg. v. Foulder, Foulkes and Johns [1973] Crim.L.R. 45 and in Reg. v. Burnett & Lee [1973] Crim.L.R. 748. 31One of the questions to be decided in this appeal is whether these cases were rightly decided. If they were, it means, to quote from ......
-
R v Looseley
...not constituting a defence, in some cases judges excluded evidence in entrapment cases: R v Foulder [1973] Crim LR 45, R v Burnett [1973] Crim LR 748 and R v Ameer [1977] Crim LR 104. Entrapment was regarded as a mitigating factor in, for instance, R v McCann (1971) 56 Cr App R 8 In R v S......
-
R. v. Loosely, (2001) 280 N.R. 229 (HL)
...R. 59, refd to. [paras. 7, 55]. R. v. Foulder, Foulkes and John, [1973] Crim. L.R. 45, refd to. [para. 7]. R. v. Burnett and Lee, [1973] Crim. L.R. 748, refd to. [para. R. v. Ameer and Lucas, [1977] Crim. L.R. 104 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 7]. R. v. McCann (Edward) (1971), 56 Cr. App. R. 359 ......
-
R v Shannon (John James)
...to exclude evidence obtained as the result of the activities of an agent provocateur: see R v Foulder [1973] Crim. L..45, R v Burnett [1973] Crim L.R. 748 and R v Amerl [977] Crim L.R. 104. Those three decisions were overruled in Sang, the House of Lords holding that, whatever the width of ......