R v Buzalek
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 1991 |
| Year | 1991 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Nigel Hunter and Others v R
...the conviction because the evidence was overwhelming. 9 Both Marr and Berrada were considered and endorsed in Buzalek and Schiffer [1991] Crim L R 116. Taylor LJ, giving the judgment of the court, acknowledged that it had become established practice that where the defendant is of good chara......
-
R v Durbin
... ... This is consistent, too, with Kabariti where the entitlement remains notwithstanding admitted lies told in interview regarding the offence ... 29 There remains, however, for consideration the judgment of this Court presided over by Taylor L.J. (as he then was) in Buzalek and Schiffer [1991] Crim.L.R. 116 , and the commentary thereon by Professor Sir John Smith. The defendant had no previous convictions but admitted some dishonesty in respect of the matters charged, and the Court recognised that "Problems arose where D had no previous convictions but, in relation ... ...
-
Gai (Appellant) R (Respondent)
...conduct in relation to the subject matter of the charge, as we hold here (contrast Zoppola-Barrazza [1994] Crim LR 83, and R v Buzalek and Schiffer [1991] Crim LR 116). In such cases, however, the terms of the direction should be modified to take account of the circumstances of the case, in......
-
R v Erica Howell and Another
...there was a need for a review of what constitutes good character, and referred to a number of authorities, particularly R v. Buzelak and Schiffer [1991] Crim LR 116, R v. Teasdale (1994) 99 CAR 80 and R. v. Challenger [1994] Crim LR 202. In Challenger the judge declined to give a good chara......
