R v Cambridge Health Authority, ex parte B

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1995
Date1995
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • R v North West Lancashire Health Authority, ex parte A ; D ; G
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 July 1999
    ... ... After fully and carefully rehearsing the competing submissions of counsel for the parties, he noted the guidance given by Sir Thomas Bingham MR in R v. Cambridge Health Authority, ex p. B [1995] 1 WLR 898 , at 906D-H, that it was for the Authority, not the court, to allocate resources within its limited budget to the best advantage of its many patients. He then found for the applicants in the following brief passage: "… in formulating policy ... ...
  • Meadows v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 21 January 2010
    ...HEALTH AUTHORITY, EX PARTE B (NO 1) 1995 1 WLR 898 1995 2 AER 129 1995 1 FLR 1055 1995 2 FCR 485 R v CAMBRIDGE HEALTH AUTHORITY, EX PARTE B 25 BMLR 5 LAWS IS THE HIGH COURT THE GUARDIAN OF FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS? 1993 PL 59 DIKILU v MIN FOR JUSTICE & INTERIM REFUGEE APPEALS AUTHO......
  • JR 47’s Application
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
    • 25 January 2013
    ... ... , while the case had proceeded solely against the Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety for Northern Ireland initially, the ... : see R –v- Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Brind [1991] 1 AC 692. This doctrine is expressed with particular clarity ... allocation decisions are graphically illustrated in R –v- Cambridge Health Authority, ex parte B [1995] 1 WLR 898, which involved an ... ...
  • R v Chief Constable of Sussex, ex parte International Traders' Ferry Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 26 July 1995
    ...of the law. (For a recent example in a parallel field where the court recognised the realities of limited resources see R. v. Cambridge Health Authority, ex p. B [1995] 2 All E.R. 129, 17The Chief Constable's reasons for his decision to restrict operation Ferndown to two consecutive days p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT