R v Catherine Michael

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt for Crown Cases Reserved
Judgment Date01 January 1839
Date01 January 1839

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Skatteforvaltningen (the Danish Customs and Tax Administration) v Solo Capital Partners LLP (in special administration) and many others
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 2 October 2025
    ...by the publication, not merely slandered him at the meeting. SKAT submitted that this was consistent with R v Michael (1840) 9 C&P 356, 173 ER 867, in which the defendant purchased poison, intending it to be administered to her baby son, to kill him. She gave it to an unknowing nurse to......
  • IL v R
    • Australia
    • High Court (Australia)
    • 9 August 2017
    ...(1933) at 113; Williams, Criminal Law: The General Part, 2nd ed (1961) at 126–127 §46, 393 §131. 142 See R v Michael (1840) 9 Car & P 356 [ 173 ER 867]; Osland (1998) 197 CLR 316 at 347–349 [85]–[88] per McHugh J (Kirby J and Callinan J agreeing at 383 [174], 413 143 Gillies, The Law of Cri......
  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Narain
    • Australia
    • Federal Court (Australia)
    • 3 July 2008
    ...Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 cited R v Butcher (1858) Bell 6 [169 ER 1145] applied R v Michael (1840) 9 Car & P 356 [173 ER 867] applied Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corp (No 2) [2003] 1 AC 959 applied Tooheys Limited v Commissi......
  • Pickett v Western Australia: Mead v Western Australia: Mead v Western Australia: Anthony v Western Australia: TSM (A Child) v Western Australia
    • Australia
    • High Court (Australia)
    • 29 May 2020
    ...as self-evident truths)”. 116 See Stephen, A History of the Criminal Law of England (1883), vol 2 at 235–237. 117 eg R v Michael (1840) 9 Car & P 356 at 358 per Alderson B [ 173 ER 867 at 868]; R v Manley (1844) 1 Cox CC 104 per Wightman 118 Dalton, The Countrey Justice, Containing the Prac......
  • Get Started for Free