R v Central Criminal Court, ex parte Propend Finance Property Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1996
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 cases
  • R (Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees and Others) v Central Criminal Court and Another Vincent Tchenguiz and (Interested Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 31 Julio 2012
    ...always give reasons. This was made clear by Watkins LJ in R v Southampton Crown Court (1992, unreported) and by Laws J in R v Central Criminal court ex p Propend [1996] Cr App R 26 at page 29: "[The judge] gave no reasons for her decision. With respect to her she should have done so. That i......
  • Mamdouh Ismail v Secretary of State for Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 26 Marzo 2013
    ...for example, Miss Montgomery submitted that there could be no question of simply 'rubber stamping' in either case. 40 In R v Central Criminal Court ex parte Propend [1996] 2 Cr. App. R. 26, the Australian Government requested the Secretary of State that premises be searched and documents s......
  • The Queen (oao Terra Services Ltd) v National Crime Agency
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 24 Junio 2020
    ...we recognise that the decision of this Court (Butler-Sloss LJ and Laws J, as he then was) in R (Propend) v Central Criminal Court [1996] 2 Cr. App. R. 26 supports its case; but we dismiss the application for judicial review against the Secretary of 7 Notwithstanding the range and detail of......
  • Magnum Investment Trading Corporation v The Attorney General of the British Virgin Islands
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 19 Julio 2018
    ...and JA Investments v CITIA Grand Court of the Cayman Islands 13 th September 2013 and R (Propend) v Central Criminal Court [1996] 2 Cr. App. R. 26. 6 [1998] AC 786 at 800 7 [2006] JLR 31 8 [2017] UKSC 3 9 [2013] Fam 276 applied in Tchenguiz v Serious Fraud Office [2014] EWHC 2597 10 [2017]......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT