R v Chapman

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
JudgeLord Justice Moore-Bick
Judgment Date29 July 2013
Neutral Citation[2013] EWCA Crim 1370
Docket NumberCase No: 201200576B4
Date29 July 2013

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Deutsche Bank AG and Others v Unitech Global Ltd and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 20 September 2013
    ... ... 13 After the hearing the Defendants' solicitors submitted by letter dated 2 August 2013 that there cannot in practice be an issue estoppel. Reliance was placed upon an observation by Moore-B ick LJ in R v Helen Chapman [2013] EWCA Crim 1370 at paragraph 24: "Once an appeal has been constituted, however, either by filing a notice of appeal in time or by obtaining an extension of time from the court, the order of the court below, although not formally provisional, is subject to review. In ... ...
  • Deutsche Bank AG v Unitech Global Ltd and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • Invalid date
  • R v Samuel Browne-Morgan
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 9 June 2017
    ...in such cases leave is required. 33 Our attention has been drawn to the decision of this court in R v Chapman [2013] EWCA Crim 1370, [2014] 1 WLR 1376section 22 of the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 ("the Act"). 3 Section 22 of the Act gives the Court power, where a pers......
  • R v Daniel John Patrick Quinn (1st Appellant) Michelle Casterton (2nd Appellant)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 26 July 2017
    ...for leave to appeal that had not been determined, as we are, it roundly rejected the assertion based on the decision in Chapman [2013] EWCA Crim 1370 that amendment to an in time appeal should be allowed out of time on the basis of a change in law between the filing of a notice of appeal an......