R v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police, ex parte Wiley ; R v Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police, ex parte Sunderland

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtHouse of Lords
Judgment Date14 July 1994
Date14 July 1994
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
102 cases
  • R A v Chief Constable of B Constabulary and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 6 December 2013
    ...indicated that the latter course is not required. 32 The proper approach is that laid down by the House of Lords in R v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police ex parte Wiley [1995] 1 AC 274. I agree with the claimant's formulation that the essence of PII is the striking of a balance betwee......
  • Darahman Ibrahim v Majlis Mesyuarat Kerajaan Negeri Perlis
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • O'Callaghan v Mahon
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 29 July 2005
    ...1996ALFRED CROMPTON AMUSEMENT MACHINES LTD v CUSTOMS & EXCISE COMMISSIONERS 1974 AC 405 R v CHIEF CONSTABLE OF WEST MIDLANDS POLICE 1995 1 AC 274 HAUGHEY & MULHERN v MORIARTY & ORS 1999 3 IR 1 NATIONAL IRISH BANK LTD & ANOR v RADIO TELIFIS EIREANN (RTE) 1998 2 IR 465 STRINGER v IRISH TIMES ......
  • Mahon and Another v Rahn and Others (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 June 2000
    ...interest immunity in favour of ensuring justice to a defendant in a criminal case. In R v Chief Constable of West Midlands ex p Wiley [1995] 1 AC 274 Lord Woolf made it clear at p297 that documents in respect of which public interest immunity could be claimed on a class basis could be discl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 books & journal articles
  • Public Interest Immunity and Disclosure of Unused Materials in Criminal Proceedings
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Financial Crime Nbr. 7-4, February 2000
    • 1 February 2000
    ...which was endorsed as correctly stating the law in R v Keane and R v Brown. (10) In R v Chief Constable of the West Midlands, ex p Wiley [1995] 1 AC 274, H L. (11) [1991] 1 WLR 281, see also the next section. (12) [1992] 2 AC 364. (13) Endorsed by the Privy Council in Vincent and Franklin v......
  • Investigation powers: ‘The new regime’
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance Nbr. 8-3, March 2000
    • 1 March 2000
    ...does not include docu-ments brought into existence in response to a threat of regulatory proceedings: Parry-Jones v Law Society. (16) 1995 1 AC 274. (17) 1995 CLC 300. (18) 1994 QB 69. (19) 1993; 16 EHRR 297. (20) 1996; 23 EHRR 313. © John Virgo and Philip Ryley 2000 Page 236...
  • Closed Trials and Secret Allegations
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The Nbr. 80-4, August 2016
    • 1 August 2016
    ...Ibid. at 119.40. Ibid. at 86.41. Ibid. at 203.42. Ibid. at 86.43. Ibid. at 85.44. RvChief Constable of West Midlands, ex p Wiley [1994] 3 WLR 433.45. T. Hickman, ‘Turning out the lights? The Justice and Security Act 2013’, (UK Constitutional Law Association, 2013).Available at: https://ukco......
  • Secrets of the Political Constitution
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 62-2, March 1999
    • 1 March 1999
    ...AC 910; Burmah Oil vBank ofEngland [1980] AC 1090; Air Canada vSS for Trade (No 2) [1983] 2 AC 394.30 RvCC of West Midlands, ex p Wiley [1995] 1 AC 274.31 HC Deb vol 576 cols 1505–1517 19 December 1996. For comment see M. Supperstone, ‘A NewApproach to Public Interest Immunity?’ [1997] PL 2......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT