R v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police, ex parte Wiley ; R v Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police, ex parte Sunderland
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 14 July 1994 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 14 July 1994 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
120 cases
-
R A v Chief Constable of B Constabulary and Another
...indicated that the latter course is not required. 32 The proper approach is that laid down by the House of Lords in R v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police ex parte Wiley [1995] 1 AC 274. I agree with the claimant's formulation that the essence of PII is the striking of a balance betwee......
- Darahman Ibrahim v Majlis Mesyuarat Kerajaan Negeri Perlis
-
O'Callaghan v Mahon
...1996ALFRED CROMPTON AMUSEMENT MACHINES LTD v CUSTOMS & EXCISE COMMISSIONERS 1974 AC 405 R v CHIEF CONSTABLE OF WEST MIDLANDS POLICE 1995 1 AC 274 HAUGHEY & MULHERN v MORIARTY & ORS 1999 3 IR 1 NATIONAL IRISH BANK LTD & ANOR v RADIO TELIFIS EIREANN (RTE) 1998 2 IR 465 STRINGER v IRISH TIME......
-
R (Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No. 2)
...a judge is better able to carry out the balancing exercise (see per Lord Woolf in R v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police ex p Wiley [1995] 1 AC 274, 289C-G, citing Lord Pearson's observations in Conway [1968] AC 910, 985). Furthermore, practically any decision of the executive is subj......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Redactions For Privilege, Irrelevance And Public Interest Immunity, And Waiver Of Privilege: High Court Provides Guidance
...PII remains the three stage test explained by the House of Lords in R v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police, ex parte Wiley [1995] 1 AC 274. Firstly, is the information relevant and material to an issue in the proceedings? Secondly, if it is relevant and material, is there a real risk t......
12 books & journal articles
-
Closed Trials and Secret Allegations
...Ibid. at 119.40. Ibid. at 86.41. Ibid. at 203.42. Ibid. at 86.43. Ibid. at 85.44. RvChief Constable of West Midlands, ex p Wiley [1994] 3 WLR 433.45. T. Hickman, ‘Turning out the lights? The Justice and Security Act 2013’, (UK Constitutional Law Association, 2013).Available at: https://ukco......
-
Public Interest Immunity and Disclosure of Unused Materials in Criminal Proceedings
...which was endorsed as correctly stating the law in R v Keane and R v Brown. (10) In R v Chief Constable of the West Midlands, ex p Wiley [1995] 1 AC 274, H L. (11) [1991] 1 WLR 281, see also the next section. (12) [1992] 2 AC 364. (13) Endorsed by the Privy Council in Vincent and Franklin v......
-
CABINET IMMUNITY IN CANADA: THE LEGAL BLACK HOLE.
...supra note 102 at 708. (247) I am paraphrasing a statement made by Lord Woolf in R v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police, [1994] 3 All ER 420 at 438, [1994] 3 WLR 433 (HL (Eng)). While Parliament can regulate Cabinet immunity by way of statute, in doing so, it must preserve the judg......
-
Investigation powers: ‘The new regime’
...does not include docu-ments brought into existence in response to a threat of regulatory proceedings: Parry-Jones v Law Society. (16) 1995 1 AC 274. (17) 1995 CLC 300. (18) 1994 QB 69. (19) 1993; 16 EHRR 297. (20) 1996; 23 EHRR 313. © John Virgo and Philip Ryley 2000 Page 236...
Request a trial to view additional results