R v Clinton

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date09 March 1993
Date09 March 1993
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
193 cases
  • DPP v McDonagh
    • Ireland
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 6 April 2001
    ...Citations: CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1984 S20(1) MACINTOSH V HM ADVOCATE 1997 SCCR R V BOAL 1992 1 QB 591CONSTITUTION ART 38.1 R V CLINTON 1993 1 WLR 1181 R V WELLINGS UNREP 20.12.1991 CODE OF CONDUCT OF THE BAR OF IRELAND PARA 4.6 CODE OF CONDUCT OF THE BAR OF IRELAND PARA 9.21 CODE OF CONDUCT......
  • Ann Marie Boodram v The State
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 10 April 2001
    ...Where counsel's conduct is called in question the general principle requires the court to focus on the impact of the faulty conduct: R v. Clinton [1993] 1 WLR 1181; Sankar v State of Trinidad and Tobago [1993] 1 WLR 194. On the other hand, as the Chief Justice observed there may be cases w......
  • Ebanks (KF) v R
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 12 April 2002
    ...dicta of Watkins, L.J. applied. (4) R. v. Burge, [1996] 1 Cr. App. R. 163; (1995), 139 Sol. Jo. (L.B.) 99, applied. (5) R. v. Clinton, [1993] 1 W.L.R. 1181; [1993] 2 All E.R. 998, applied. (6) R. v. Dehar, [1969] N.Z.L.R. 763, dicta of Turner J. applied. (7) R. v. Goodway, [1993] 4 All E.R.......
  • Davis v R
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 9 August 1996
    ...(2) -D.P.P. v. Doot, [1973] A.C. 807; [1973] 1 All E.R. 940, dicta of Lord Pearson and Viscount Dilhorne applied. (3) -R. v. Clinton, [1993] 1 W.L.R. 1181; [1993] 2 All E.R. 998; (1993), 97 Cr. App. R. 320, followed. (4) -R. v. DuncanUNK(1981), 73 Cr. App. R. 359; [1981] Crim. L.R. _560. (5......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Court of Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 58-3, August 1994
    • 1 August 1994
    ...is the question which faces the court when accusations are madeagainst legal advisers as a groundofappeal was made clear in R v Clinton(1993) 1 WLR 1181; 58lCL59 (where the court suggested that to describesuch an accusation if well-founded as a 'material irregularity' was anerror). That cas......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT