R v Commission for Racial Equality, ex parte Hillingdon London Borough Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1981 |
| Date | 1981 |
| Year | 1981 |
| Court | House of Lords |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
35 cases
-
Re Prestige Group Plc
...that was not put to this House in Hillingdon either in oral argument or in the written case of the CREHillingdon London Borough Council v. Commission for Racial Equality [1982] A.C. 779, had occasion to consider and construe those provisions of the Race Relations Act 1976 ("the Act") that d......
- National Union of Bank Employees v Director General of Trade Unions
-
The Queen (on the application of S) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department Geo Group Ltd and Others (Interested Parties)
...is regarded as the enemy of justice. Fairness is the guiding principle of our public law. In R v Commission for Racial Equality, Ex p Hillingdon London Borough Council [1982] AC 779, 787, Lord Diplock explained the position: "Where an Act of Parliament confers upon an administrative body fu......
-
The Children's Rights Alliance for England v Secretary of State for Justice G4s Care and Justice Services (uk) Ltd and Another (Interested Parties)
...Fairness is the guiding principle of our public law. In R v Commission for Racial Equality, Ex p Hillingdon London Borough Council [1982] AC 779, 787, Lord Diplock explained the position: "Where an Act of Parliament confers upon an administrative body functions which involve its making deci......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Defining the limits of discrimination law in the United Kingdom
...Relations Board [1973] AC 868; Dockers’ Labour Club v. Race Rela-tions Board [1976] AC 285; R v. CRE, ex p. Hillingdon Borough Council [1982] A.C. 779; Inre Prestige [1984] I.C.R. 473.98 International Journal of Discrimination and the Law 64. See C. O’Cinneide, ‘The CommissionFor Equality A......
-
Employee-referral schemes and discrimination law
...London: TSO, para. 4.25.58. EA 2006, section 20(3).59. This was established under the original regime in Hillingdon London BC v. CRE [1982] AC779 (HL).60. EA 2006, section 20(1)(b) and (c).61. EA 2006, subsections 21–22.62. EA 2006, section 23(2).63 Available at: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpg......
-
Barking and Biting: The Equal Opportunity Commission as an Enforcement Agency
...halt’: at 1201. The other decisions which impacted upon the conduct of investigations were R v CRE, ex parte London Borough of Hillingdon [1982] AC 779 and Re Prestige Group plc [1984] 1 WLR 335 (‘Prestige’). See also Catherine Barnard, ‘A European Litigation Strategy: The Case of the Equal......
-
Reform of United Kingdom Discrimination Law: Philosophy, Principle or Pragmatism?
...op cit, note 4 above, at para.3.3.101 ibid, at paras.3.4-3.7.102 Hillingdon London Borough Council v Commission for Racial Equality[1982] AC 779;Re Prestige Group plc[1984] 1 WLR 335.103 Parekh, op cit, note 6 above, at pp 280-81.104 ibid, at pp 284-88.105 ibid, at pp 284-85.106 ibid, at p ......