R v Cotham

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1898
Year1898
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
32 cases
  • R v Great Yarmouth Licensing Justices, ex parte Hamilton
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Commissioners of Inland Revenue v National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Businesses Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 9 April 1981
    ...to Rex v. Manchester Corporation [1911] 1 KB 560 where Lord Alverstone C.J. referred to the apparent inconsistency of Reg. v. Cotham (1898) 1 QB 802 where a very slight interest was held to be sufficient to allow the application, with the decision in the Lewisham case. He contends that alth......
  • R v Paddington Valuation Officer. ex parte Peachey Property Corporation Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 1 June 1965
    ...due course go to quash it. But I see no reason why a mandamus should not issue in advance of the certiorari: c.f. ( Regina v. Cotham 1898 1 Queen's Bench 802) If the existing list has been compiled on the wrong footing the Court can order the Valuation Officer to make a new list on the righ......
  • Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 17 December 1968
    ...if they thought that the person was de jure an officer and entitled to compensation their order was not removable. 54 In his judgment in Reg. v. Cotham (1898) 1 Q.B. 802 Kennedy J. (at page 808) noted the distinction between, on the one hand, disregarding the provisions of a statute and con......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT