R v Cox and Railton

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1884
Year1884
CourtCourt for Crown Cases Reserved
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
189 cases
  • R v Snaresbrook Crown Court, ex parte DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • Invalid date
    ...... 1058E–G , 1059D–F , 1060B , E–G ). . Reg. v. Cox and Railton ( 1884 ) 14 Q.B.D. 153 , C.C.R. and Banque Keyser Ullmann S.A. v. Skandia (U.K.) Insurance Co. Ltd. [ 1986 ] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 336 , C.A. distinguished. . . . . . The following cases are referred to in the judgment of Glidewell L.J.: . Banque Keyser Ullmann S.A. v. Skandia (U.K.) ......
  • JSC BTA Bank (Claimant) Mukhtar Ablyazov and Others (Defendants) Mukhtar Ablyazov and Others (Respondents)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 8 August 2014
    ...of Mr Shalabayev. The law 68 The principle invoked by the Bank, sometimes called the "fraud exception", finds its modern origin in R v Cox and Railton (1884) 14 QBD 153, and was summarised by Longmore LJ in Kuwait Airways (No 6) at [14] as being that if a person consults a solicitor in furt......
  • Dubai Aluminium Company Ltd v Sayed Reyadh Abdulla S Nasser Al Alawi and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 3 December 1999
    ...legitimate professional business of advising and assisting clients on their past conduct, however iniquitous. The Queen v CoxELR ((1884) 14 QBD 153, 167) supported that conclusion. His Lordship was therefore of the opinion that the documents sought were in principle within the established e......
  • R. v. Shalala (R.), (1997) 197 N.B.R.(2d) 304 (TD)
    • Canada
    • New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • 18 August 1997
    ...R. v. Edwards (C.), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 128; 192 N.R. 81; 88 O.A.C. 321; 104 C.C.C.(3d) 136, refd to. [para. 5]. R. v. Cox and Railton (1884), 14 Q.B.D. 153, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 488.1 [para. 12]. Counsel: G. Scott Ellsworth, for the Crown......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
9 books & journal articles
  • ENLARGED PANELS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2019, December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...v Sihabduin bin Haji Salleh [1980] 2 MLJ 273. In the UK, see, for instance, Saunders v Richardson (1881) 7 QBD 388; R v Cox and Railton (1884) 14 QBD 153; R v Dennis [1894] 2 QB 458; Bradford v Dawson [1897] 1 QB 307; Allen v Flood [1898] AC 1; Kruse v Johnson [1898] 2 QB 91; R v Stoddart (......
  • NEW TWISTS IN LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE: COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF LITIGATION AND BETWEEN THE LAWYER AND CLIENT
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2002, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...after note 87. 96 For example, the illustrations to the provisos in s 128 (a) and (b) are founded on cases such as R v Cox and Railton(1884) 14 QBD 153 and Brown v Foster(1857) 1 H & N 736. Also see O’Rourke v Darbishire[1920] AC 581. The doctrine of express and implied waiver of privilege ......
  • Subject Index, Volume 82, 2009
    • United Kingdom
    • Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 82-4, December 2009
    • 1 December 2009
    ...v UK (2000) 29 EHRR 245 84–85, 86Pepper v Hart [1993] AC 593 351Prymer v Odgen, 29 F 3d 1208 (7 cir. 1994) 27R v Cox and Railton (1884) 14 QBD 153 186R v Hornchurch and Blackmore; R v Marquis and Graham; R v Carter[2009] EWCA Crim 964, CA (Crim) 356–361R v JTB [2009] UKHL 20, HL 349–352R (A......
  • Confidentiality Exceptions
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • 19 June 2015
    ...55–58. 195 Campbell, ibid at para 63. 196 This is the view taken by Woolley, above note 44 at 113 and 170. 197 R v Cox and Railton (1884), 14 QBD 153 at 168: “If his criminal object is avowed, the client does not consult his adviser professionally, because it cannot be the solicitor’s busin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT