R v Cox and Railton
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1884 |
| Year | 1884 |
| Court | Court for Crown Cases Reserved |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
208 cases
-
R v Snaresbrook Crown Court, ex parte DPP
... ... 1058E–G , 1059D–F , 1060B , E–G ) ... Reg. v. Cox and Railton ( 1884 ) 14 Q.B.D. 153 , C.C.R. and Banque Keyser Ullmann S.A. v. Skandia (U.K.) Insurance Co. Ltd. [ 1986 ] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 336 , C.A. distinguished ... The following cases are referred to in the judgment of Glidewell L.J.: ... Banque Keyser Ullmann S.A. v. Skandia (U.K.) ... ...
-
JSC BTA Bank (Claimant) Mukhtar Ablyazov and Others (Defendants) Mukhtar Ablyazov and Others (Respondents)
...the language used in early formulations of the principle (see Garside v Outram (1857) 26 LJ (Ch) 113 per Sir William Page Wood VC and R v Cox and Railton per Stephen J at 171). I shall refer to it as the iniquity 69 As is well known, there are two classes of legal professional privilege, le......
-
Dubai Aluminium Company Ltd v Sayed Reyadh Abdulla S Nasser Al Alawi and Others
...legitimate professional business of advising and assisting clients on their past conduct, however iniquitous. The Queen v CoxELR ((1884) 14 QBD 153, 167) supported that conclusion. His Lordship was therefore of the opinion that the documents sought were in principle within the established e......
-
Butler v Board of Trade
...the letter could be shown prima facie to be preparatory to the commission of a crime or fraud (post, pp. 686G, 687C-D). Reg. v. Cox and Railton (1884) 14 Q.B.D. 153;Bullivant v. Attorney-General for Victoria [1901] A.C. 196, H.L.(E.) andO'Rourke v. Darbishire [1920] A.C. 581, H.L.(E.) appli......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Loreley Financing (Jersey) No 30 Ltd v Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Ltd [2022] EWHC 1136 (Comm)
...is that "a client must be free to consult his legal advisers without fear of his communications being revealed (R v Cox and Railton (1884) 14 QBD 153. Legal advice privilege applies to between a lawyer and the client for the purposes of obtaining legal advice, "notwithstanding that they do ......
12 books & journal articles
-
ENLARGED PANELS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF SINGAPORE
...v Sihabduin bin Haji Salleh [1980] 2 MLJ 273. In the UK, see, for instance, Saunders v Richardson (1881) 7 QBD 388; R v Cox and Railton (1884) 14 QBD 153; R v Dennis [1894] 2 QB 458; Bradford v Dawson [1897] 1 QB 307; Allen v Flood [1898] AC 1; Kruse v Johnson [1898] 2 QB 91; R v Stoddart (......
-
NEW TWISTS IN LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE: COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF LITIGATION AND BETWEEN THE LAWYER AND CLIENT
...after note 87. 96 For example, the illustrations to the provisos in s 128 (a) and (b) are founded on cases such as R v Cox and Railton(1884) 14 QBD 153 and Brown v Foster(1857) 1 H & N 736. Also see O’Rourke v Darbishire[1920] AC 581. The doctrine of express and implied waiver of privilege ......
-
Police powers in England and Wales: the courts and the changes of pace
...to legal privilege". 37 [1988] 3 All E.R. 775 at 787. 38 [1988] 3 All E.R. 775 at 780 (Lord Bridge), at 790 (Lord Griffiths). 39 (1884) 14 Q.B.D. 153. This resulting triumph of the common law also prayed in aid the benefit of the Lords' presumption as to what Parliament must have intended: ......
-
Subject Index, Volume 82, 2009
...v UK (2000) 29 EHRR 245 84–85, 86Pepper v Hart [1993] AC 593 351Prymer v Odgen, 29 F 3d 1208 (7 cir. 1994) 27R v Cox and Railton (1884) 14 QBD 153 186R v Hornchurch and Blackmore; R v Marquis and Graham; R v Carter[2009] EWCA Crim 964, CA (Crim) 356–361R v JTB [2009] UKHL 20, HL 349–352R (A......
Get Started for Free