R v Cox and Railton
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1884 |
Year | 1884 |
Court | Court for Crown Cases Reserved |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
189 cases
-
R v Snaresbrook Crown Court, ex parte DPP
...... 1058E–G , 1059D–F , 1060B , E–G ). . Reg. v. Cox and Railton ( 1884 ) 14 Q.B.D. 153 , C.C.R. and Banque Keyser Ullmann S.A. v. Skandia (U.K.) Insurance Co. Ltd. [ 1986 ] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 336 , C.A. distinguished. . . . . . The following cases are referred to in the judgment of Glidewell L.J.: . Banque Keyser Ullmann S.A. v. Skandia (U.K.) ......
-
JSC BTA Bank (Claimant) Mukhtar Ablyazov and Others (Defendants) Mukhtar Ablyazov and Others (Respondents)
...of Mr Shalabayev. The law 68 The principle invoked by the Bank, sometimes called the "fraud exception", finds its modern origin in R v Cox and Railton (1884) 14 QBD 153, and was summarised by Longmore LJ in Kuwait Airways (No 6) at [14] as being that if a person consults a solicitor in furt......
-
Dubai Aluminium Company Ltd v Sayed Reyadh Abdulla S Nasser Al Alawi and Others
...legitimate professional business of advising and assisting clients on their past conduct, however iniquitous. The Queen v CoxELR ((1884) 14 QBD 153, 167) supported that conclusion. His Lordship was therefore of the opinion that the documents sought were in principle within the established e......
-
R. v. Shalala (R.), (1997) 197 N.B.R.(2d) 304 (TD)
...R. v. Edwards (C.), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 128; 192 N.R. 81; 88 O.A.C. 321; 104 C.C.C.(3d) 136, refd to. [para. 5]. R. v. Cox and Railton (1884), 14 Q.B.D. 153, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 488.1 [para. 12]. Counsel: G. Scott Ellsworth, for the Crown......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Loreley Financing (Jersey) No 30 Ltd v Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Ltd [2022] EWHC 1136 (Comm)
...is that "a client must be free to consult his legal advisers without fear of his communications being revealed (R v Cox and Railton (1884) 14 QBD 153. Legal advice privilege applies to between a lawyer and the client for the purposes of obtaining legal advice, "notwithstanding that they do ......
9 books & journal articles
-
ENLARGED PANELS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF SINGAPORE
...v Sihabduin bin Haji Salleh [1980] 2 MLJ 273. In the UK, see, for instance, Saunders v Richardson (1881) 7 QBD 388; R v Cox and Railton (1884) 14 QBD 153; R v Dennis [1894] 2 QB 458; Bradford v Dawson [1897] 1 QB 307; Allen v Flood [1898] AC 1; Kruse v Johnson [1898] 2 QB 91; R v Stoddart (......
-
NEW TWISTS IN LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE: COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF LITIGATION AND BETWEEN THE LAWYER AND CLIENT
...after note 87. 96 For example, the illustrations to the provisos in s 128 (a) and (b) are founded on cases such as R v Cox and Railton(1884) 14 QBD 153 and Brown v Foster(1857) 1 H & N 736. Also see O’Rourke v Darbishire[1920] AC 581. The doctrine of express and implied waiver of privilege ......
-
Subject Index, Volume 82, 2009
...v UK (2000) 29 EHRR 245 84–85, 86Pepper v Hart [1993] AC 593 351Prymer v Odgen, 29 F 3d 1208 (7 cir. 1994) 27R v Cox and Railton (1884) 14 QBD 153 186R v Hornchurch and Blackmore; R v Marquis and Graham; R v Carter[2009] EWCA Crim 964, CA (Crim) 356–361R v JTB [2009] UKHL 20, HL 349–352R (A......
-
Confidentiality Exceptions
...55–58. 195 Campbell, ibid at para 63. 196 This is the view taken by Woolley, above note 44 at 113 and 170. 197 R v Cox and Railton (1884), 14 QBD 153 at 168: “If his criminal object is avowed, the client does not consult his adviser professionally, because it cannot be the solicitor’s busin......
Request a trial to view additional results