R v Cox and Railton

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt for Crown Cases Reserved
Year1884
Date1884

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
163 cases
  • R v Snaresbrook Crown Court, ex parte DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 1058E–G , 1059D–F , 1060B , E–G ) ... Reg. v. Cox and Railton ( 1884 ) 14 Q.B.D. 153 , C.C.R. and Banque Keyser Ullmann S.A. v. Skandia (U.K.) Insurance Co. Ltd. [ 1986 ] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 336 , C.A. distinguished ... The following cases are referred to in the judgment of Glidewell L.J.: ... Banque Keyser Ullmann S.A. v. Skandia (U.K.) ... ...
  • JSC BTA Bank (Claimant) Mukhtar Ablyazov and Others (Defendants) Mukhtar Ablyazov and Others (Respondents)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 8 August 2014
    ...the language used in early formulations of the principle (see Garside v Outram (1857) 26 LJ (Ch) 113 per Sir William Page Wood VC and R v Cox and Railton per Stephen J at 171). I shall refer to it as the iniquity 69 As is well known, there are two classes of legal professional privilege, le......
  • Dubai Aluminium Company Ltd v Sayed Reyadh Abdulla S Nasser Al Alawi and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 3 December 1999
    ...legitimate professional business of advising and assisting clients on their past conduct, however iniquitous. The Queen v CoxELR ((1884) 14 QBD 153, 167) supported that conclusion. His Lordship was therefore of the opinion that the documents sought were in principle within the established e......
  • Butler v Board of Trade
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...the letter could be shown prima facie to be preparatory to the commission of a crime or fraud (post, pp. 686G, 687C-D). Reg. v. Cox and Railton (1884) 14 Q.B.D. 153;Bullivant v. Attorney-General for Victoria [1901] A.C. 196, H.L.(E.) andO'Rourke v. Darbishire [1920] A.C. 581, H.L.(E.) appli......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
6 books & journal articles
  • ENLARGED PANELS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2019, January - December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...v Sihabduin bin Haji Salleh [1980] 2 MLJ 273. In the UK, see, for instance, Saunders v Richardson (1881) 7 QBD 388; R v Cox and Railton (1884) 14 QBD 153; R v Dennis [1894] 2 QB 458; Bradford v Dawson [1897] 1 QB 307; Allen v Flood [1898] AC 1; Kruse v Johnson [1898] 2 QB 91; R v Stoddart (......
  • NEW TWISTS IN LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE: COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF LITIGATION AND BETWEEN THE LAWYER AND CLIENT
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2002, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...after note 87. 96 For example, the illustrations to the provisos in s 128 (a) and (b) are founded on cases such as R v Cox and Railton(1884) 14 QBD 153 and Brown v Foster(1857) 1 H & N 736. Also see O’Rourke v Darbishire[1920] AC 581. The doctrine of express and implied waiver of privilege ......
  • Police powers in England and Wales: the courts and the changes of pace
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 3-2, December 1993
    • 1 December 1993
    ...to legal privilege". 37 [1988] 3 All E.R. 775 at 787. 38 [1988] 3 All E.R. 775 at 780 (Lord Bridge), at 790 (Lord Griffiths). 39 (1884) 14 Q.B.D. 153. This resulting triumph of the common law also prayed in aid the benefit of the Lords' presumption as to what Parliament must have intended: ......
  • Subject Index, Volume 82, 2009
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 82-4, December 2009
    • 1 December 2009
    ...v UK (2000) 29 EHRR 245 84–85, 86Pepper v Hart [1993] AC 593 351Prymer v Odgen, 29 F 3d 1208 (7 cir. 1994) 27R v Cox and Railton (1884) 14 QBD 153 186R v Hornchurch and Blackmore; R v Marquis and Graham; R v Carter[2009] EWCA Crim 964, CA (Crim) 356–361R v JTB [2009] UKHL 20, HL 349–352R (A......
  • Get Started for Free