R v Craven (Stephen)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 2001 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
R (Brooks) v Parole Board and Secretary of State for the Home Department
...is not necessarily unfair to admit hearsay evidence, even when the deprivation of liberty is at stake, as in R (McKeown) v Wirral MBC [2001] 2 Cr App R 12. At paragraph 57 he said - "Merely because some factual matter is in dispute does not render hearsay evidence about it in principle inad......
-
R (O) v Crown Court at Harrow
...equally, we think, to related interlocutory questions of the sort here in question.” In R (D.P.P.) v Havering Magistrates’ Court [2001] 2 Cr App R 12 this court was concerned with the power of a justice of the peace under section 7(5) of the Bail Act to remand in custody a defendant arrest......
-
R (Sim) v Parole Board
...to admit hearsay evidence, even where the deprivation of liberty is at stake: see R (McKeown) –v—Wirral Borough Magistrates Court [2001] 2 Cr. App. R. 12. In that case the Divisional Court had to consider the position under section 7(5) of the Bail Act 1976, where a justice before whom som......
-
R v Hanratty (James) (Deceased)
...Mansfield's approach to section 23 is inconsistent with the decisions of this Court in Gilfoyle [1996] 1 Cr App R 302 and in Craven [2001] 2 Cr App R 12. In Craven there was a failure by the prosecution to disclose certain material which could have been of relevance to the defence at the ......
Request a trial to view additional results