R v Criminal Cases Review Commission, ex parte Pearson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1999 |
| Year | 1999 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
109 cases
-
R v Erskine; R v Williams
...conclusion was that “in the last analysis as appears from all these decisions each case turned on its own facts”. 51 R v Criminal Cases Review Commission ex parte Pearson [2000] 1 Cr App R 141, involved an application for judicial review of a decision by the Criminal Cases Review Commission......
-
Daniel v The State
...before the trial jury a defence known to be available": R v Erskine and Williams [2010] 1 WLR 183 at para 90, quoting R v Criminal Cases Review Commission, Ex p Pearson [1993] 3 All ER 498, 517. Mr Knox submits that the decision not to run diminished responsibility was taken for tactical r......
-
R (Edwards) v Criminal Cases Review Commission
...test to be applied by the court in present circumstances was stated by Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Chief Justice, in R v Criminal Cases Review Commission, Ex parte Pearson [1999] 3 All E.R. 498, at page 521: “The real test must be to ask whether the reasons given by the Commission betray, to ......
-
R v Dallas (Glenn Kenneth)
...lurking doubt, or uneasiness, as to whether an injustice has been done as mentioned by Lord Bingham (when Lord Chief Justice) in R v CCRC ex parte Pearson [1999] 3 All ER 498 at page 503 applies to this case. 26 For the reasons we have sought to give, we are perfectly satisfied that the app......
Get Started for Free
11 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Causley, [2003] EWCA Crim 1840 ............................................................. 85, 88– 89 R. v. CCRC ex parte Pearson, [1999] 3 All E.R. 498 ...................................................... 333 R. v. Clark (No. 2), [2003] EWCA Crim 1020 .........................45, 46–47......
-
Women Who Kill Abusive Men: The Limitations of Loss of Control, Provocation and Self-Defence in England and Wales and Canada
...failed and a conviction for murder followed. R v Hobson [1998] 1 CrApp Rep 31. R v Criminal Cases Review Commission, ex parte Pearson [1999] 3 All ER 498. R v Anderson [2000] LexisCitation 4342. R v Keaveney [2004] EWCA Crim 1091. R v Carson [2004] NICC 5. R v Cole [2005] EWCA Crim 1335.R v......
-
Women Who Kill Abusive Men: The Limitations of Loss of Control, Provocation and Self-Defence in England and Wales and Canada
...failed and a conviction for murder followed. R v Hobson [1998] 1 CrApp Rep 31. R v Criminal Cases Review Commission, ex parte Pearson [1999] 3 All ER 498. R v Anderson [2000] LexisCitation 4342. R v Keaveney [2004] EWCA Crim 1091. R v Carson [2004] NICC 5. R v Cole [2005] EWCA Crim 1335.R v......
-
The Right to Appeal and Workable Systems of Justice
...a person who isdead (RvMaguire [1992] QB 936).45 See the judgment of Lord Bingham CJ in RvCriminal Cases Review Commission Ex p Pearson(1999) 3 All ER 498.46 Although the figures vary from year to year, it would be fair to say that on average one third of leaveapplications for conviction ap......
Get Started for Free