R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte Lain

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Year1967
Date1967

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
164 cases
  • Law v National Greyhound Racing Club Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 July 1983
    ...the Courts have always refused to use the orders of certiorari to review the decisions of domestic tribunals. In Reg. v. Criminal Injuries Compensation Board. Ex parte Lain [1967] 2 QB 864 Lord Parker, C.J. said at page 882: "Private or domestic tribunals have always been outside the scope ......
  • Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 22 November 1984
    ...shown themselves ready to control by way of judicial review the actions of a tribunal set up under the prerogative. Reg. v. Criminal Injuries Compensation Board Ex parte Lain [1967] 2 Q.B. 864 was such a case. In that case Lord Parker C.J. said, at p. 881: "I can see no reason either in pr......
  • R v Panel on Take-overs and Mergers, ex parte Datafin Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 5 December 1986
    ...are applied if its edicts are ignored and performs what might be described as public law functions. 28In The Queen v. Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte Lain [1967] 2 Q.B. 864, 882, Lord Parker C.J., who had unrivalled experience of the prerogative remedies both on the bench and......
  • Re Fong Thin Choo
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 29 April 1991
    ... ... Port of Singapore Authority for loading on board a vessel `MV Sempurna Sejati` (`the vessel`) for ... , on 30 December 1988, took out an ex parte application for leave to apply for an order of ... In R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex p Lain ,2 Lord ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
  • Not So Neat: Non-Statutory Corporations and the Reach of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 32-1, March 2004
    • 1 March 2004
    ...Journal of Administrative Law 77. 72 See especially Datafin [1987] 1 QB 815; and R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, Ex parte Lain [1967] 2 QB 864. 73 Lord Woolf, Jowell and Le Sueur, above n 40, 65. 154 Federal Law Review Volume 32 ____________________________________________________......
  • Griffith University V Tang, ‘Under an Enactment’ and Limiting Access to Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 33-3, September 2005
    • 1 September 2005
    ...133 See discussion below around n 166 and following. 134 [1967] 2 QB 864 ('Lain'). 135 Ibid 888. The judgment of Brennan CJ, Gaudron and Gummow JJ in Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (1996) 185 CLR 149 quoted this passage from Lord Diplock with apparent approval in discussing the availability ......
  • Private Bodies, Public Power and Soft Law in the High Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 35-1, March 2007
    • 1 March 2007
    ...of Administrative Action (3rd ed, 2004) 128–9. 12 Ibid 132–6, 359–64. 13 Since R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board; Ex parte Lain [1967] 2 QB 864; see Aronson, Dyer and Groves, above n 11, 115–17, 132–6. 14 Aronson, Dyer and Groves, above n 11, 351–8. 15 R v Panel on Take-overs and Mer......
  • Not So Neat: Non-Statutory Corporations and the Reach of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 32-1, March 2004
    • 1 March 2004
    ...Journal of Administrative Law 77. 72 See especially Datafin [1987] 1 QB 815; and R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, Ex parte Lain [1967] 2 QB 864. 73 Lord Woolf, Jowell and Le Sueur, above n 40, 65. 154 Federal Law Review Volume 32 ____________________________________________________......
  • Get Started for Free