R v Cristini
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1987 |
| Date | 1987 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
29 cases
-
DPP v Cronin
...V DPP 1935 AC 462 R V MANCINI 1942 AC 1 SEAN DORAN 1991 CRIM LR 878 DPP V HANLEY UNREP BARRINGTON 5.11.1999 2000/7/2413 R V CRISITINI 1987 CRIM LR 504 AG, PEOPLE V BYRNE 1974 IR 1 DPP V WALLACE UNREP KEANE 30.4.2001 2001/8/2212 AG V GILLIGAN UNREP 1929 SANDS CRIMINAL LAW 180 AG, PEOPLE V......
-
Crosdale v R
...raised on appeal. It was an important point. It was an issue, which had not been actively canvassed at the trial. In R. v. Cristini [1987] Crim.L.R. 504 Watkins L.J. observed that (at page 507):– “… judges, if they are to introduce an issue into the summing up which has not been actively ca......
-
R v Brenda Joan Gaze
...by not being given an opportunity to deal with this issue fully in advance. 19 Reference was made to three authorities, R v. Cristini [1987] Crim.L.R. 504, R v. Utting 86 Cr.App.R. 164 and R v. Warbuton-Pitt 92 Cr.App.R. 136. In each of these cases convictions were quashed in circumstances ......
-
R v Coleridge Hastings-Coker and Another
...address to the jury, this was an issue which was "actively canvassed in the course of the hearing" — to use the words of Watkins LJ in R v Christina [1987] Crim LR 504, to which Professor Smith also made reference. Mr Sullivan conceded, in argument before us, that there was no new evidence ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Judge and Jury: Towards a New Division of Labour in Criminal Trials
...4.19–4.30. This recommendation has been endorsed by the Court of Appeal in RvMakanjuola,RvEaston [1995] 3 All ER 730.80 RvCristini [1987] Crim LR 504, 507.81 Crosdale vR[1995] 2 All ER 500.82 See Jackson, ‘The Value of Jury Trial’ in Attwooll and Goldberg (eds), Criminal Justice (Stuttgart:......
-
Court of Appeal
...argued that the facts in that case were quite different fromthose in the instant case, so far as counsel were concerned. In RvChristini[1987]Crim LR 504, the court reiterated the principle that 'judges, if theyare to introduce an issue into the summing-up which has not been activelycanvasse......