R v Croydon Crown Court, ex parte Clair
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1986 |
| Year | 1986 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
R (Upon the application of Lehram Capital Investments Ltd) v Southwark Crown Court
...a party does not appear or is not represented, the proper course is to dismiss the appeal. See Croydon Crown Court, ex parte Clare [1986] 1 WLR 746. The decision of the Divisional Court, Queen's Bench Division. We shall accordingly dismiss the appeal, but before we do so, while the law is ......
-
Junior Lawal v The Crown Court at Cambridge
...a very strong and satisfactory explanation for the appellant's absence. 18 In support of the final option Mr Mably relies on R v Croydon Crown Court, Ex p. Clair [1986] 1 WLR 746. The facts of that case were very different in that one of three appellants did not feel able to attend his app......
-
Podmore v DPP
...the evidence. 13 All those matters are made good in a decision of this Court, that is to say R v. Croydon Crown Court Ex parte Clair (1986) 83 Cr.App.R. 202, a case which is in many ways analogous to the present. 14 The appellant error here was that he sought to bring up and quash an order ......
-
Pennesi v R
...S. Bulgin, Crown Counsel, for the Crown. Cases cited: (1) Fiallo v. R., 1986–87 CILR 253. (2) R. v. Croydon Crown Court, ex p. Clair, [1986] 1 W.L.R. 746; [1986] 2 All. E.R. 716; (1986), 83 Cr. App. R. 29, observations of Croom-Johnson, L.J. considered. (3) R. v. ThompsonUNK(1964), 6 W.I.R.......