R v Davies (Michael George) (No.3)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2001
Year2001
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 cases
  • R v Lyons ; R v Parnes ; R v Ronson ; R v Saunders (No 3)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 21 December 2002
    ... ... The Hon Michael Beloff QC, & Mr Murray Hunt (instructed by DJ Freeman) appeared for ... ...
  • R v El-Kurd (No 2) ; R v K ; R v S ; R v X
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 26 July 2007
    ...Graham, could be cured by amending the pleaded particulars of offence. Safety: (2) Application of the Stirland test as reformulated in R v Davies , Rowe and Johnson 55 On behalf of all these appellants it is submitted that the misdirections in the summings up as to the required mens rea ar......
  • R v H and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 16 October 2003
  • Jordan Towers Anthony Stewart Hawkes v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 20 February 2019
    ...the expression “whether the change in the law would have made a difference” imputed a different test to that laid down in R v Davis [2001] 1 Cr App R 8 as adapted from Stirland v DPP [1944] AC 315. In this vein, he submitted that it was because all but one of the applicants in the conjoine......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 7-4, December 2003
    • 1 December 2003
    ...116R v Davis, Rowe and Johnson (No. 2),The Times (24 April 2000) ..............117R v Davis, Rowe and Johnson (No. 3)[2001] 1 Cr App R 8 ....................... 117R v Deen [1994] TLR 11, The Times (10January 1994), CA ................ 176, 268R v Denton [2002] Crim LR 272 .......106R v Der......
  • The Right to Appeal and Workable Systems of Justice
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 65-5, September 2002
    • 1 September 2002
    ...law, through its practice on granting leave. Itwould not ordinarily grant leave to appeal out of time in cases where the appeal was54 [2001] 1 Cr App R 8.September 2002] The Right to Appeal and Workable Systems of JusticeßThe Modern Law Review Limited 2002 based on a change in the law appli......
  • ‘Unsafe’ Convictions: Defining and Compensating Miscarriages of Justice
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 66-3, May 2003
    • 1 May 2003
    ...even when there was no doubt that the appellant wasguilty.40 [1998] 2 Cr App R 7941 See n 1 above, 161.42 (1999) Crim LR 679.43 [2001] 1 Cr App R 8.The Modern Law Review [Vol. 66448 rThe Modern Law Review Limited Mullen (no 1) and Condron were approved by Lord Woolf in RvTogher whichwas dec......
  • The Supreme Court on Compensation for Miscarriages of Justice: Is it better that ten innocents are denied compensation than one guilty person receives it?
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 75-3, May 2012
    • 1 May 2012
    ...in the magistrates’ cour t:the forgotten power of the Criminal Cases ReviewCommission’ [2006] CLR 124.17 RvDavis, Rowe and Johnson [2001] 1 Cr App R 8 at [56] per Mantell LJ.18 Adams n 5 above at [37].Compensation for Miscarriages of Justice© 2012 TheAuthors. The Modern Law Review © 2012The......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT