R v Davies (Michael George) (No.3)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2001 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
R v Lyons ; R v Parnes ; R v Ronson ; R v Saunders (No 3)
...... The Hon Michael Beloff QC, & Mr Murray Hunt (instructed by DJ Freeman) appeared for ......
-
R v El-Kurd (No 2) ; R v K ; R v S ; R v X
...Graham, could be cured by amending the pleaded particulars of offence. Safety: (2) Application of the Stirland test as reformulated in R v Davies , Rowe and Johnson 55 On behalf of all these appellants it is submitted that the misdirections in the summings up as to the required mens rea ar......
- R v H and Another
-
Jordan Towers Anthony Stewart Hawkes v The Queen
...the expression “whether the change in the law would have made a difference” imputed a different test to that laid down in R v Davis [2001] 1 Cr App R 8 as adapted from Stirland v DPP [1944] AC 315. In this vein, he submitted that it was because all but one of the applicants in the conjoine......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
...116R v Davis, Rowe and Johnson (No. 2),The Times (24 April 2000) ..............117R v Davis, Rowe and Johnson (No. 3)[2001] 1 Cr App R 8 ....................... 117R v Deen [1994] TLR 11, The Times (10January 1994), CA ................ 176, 268R v Denton [2002] Crim LR 272 .......106R v Der......
-
The Right to Appeal and Workable Systems of Justice
...law, through its practice on granting leave. Itwould not ordinarily grant leave to appeal out of time in cases where the appeal was54 [2001] 1 Cr App R 8.September 2002] The Right to Appeal and Workable Systems of JusticeßThe Modern Law Review Limited 2002 based on a change in the law appli......
-
‘Unsafe’ Convictions: Defining and Compensating Miscarriages of Justice
...even when there was no doubt that the appellant wasguilty.40 [1998] 2 Cr App R 7941 See n 1 above, 161.42 (1999) Crim LR 679.43 [2001] 1 Cr App R 8.The Modern Law Review [Vol. 66448 rThe Modern Law Review Limited Mullen (no 1) and Condron were approved by Lord Woolf in RvTogher whichwas dec......
-
The Supreme Court on Compensation for Miscarriages of Justice: Is it better that ten innocents are denied compensation than one guilty person receives it?
...in the magistrates’ cour t:the forgotten power of the Criminal Cases ReviewCommission’ [2006] CLR 124.17 RvDavis, Rowe and Johnson [2001] 1 Cr App R 8 at [56] per Mantell LJ.18 Adams n 5 above at [37].Compensation for Miscarriages of Justice© 2012 TheAuthors. The Modern Law Review © 2012The......
Request a trial to view additional results