R v Davis (1993)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1993
Date1993
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
89 cases
  • R v Keane
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 14 Marzo 1994
    ...Ward itself was not yet reported although a transcript of part of the judgment was quoted to the learned judge. Davis, Johnson and Rowe 97 Cr App R 110, in which this court outlined the procedure to be followed where the Crown rely on public interest immunity or sensitivity to withhold mat......
  • Connolly v R
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 17 Febrero 2006
    ...for Connolly; J.H. Furniss for Brandt. Cases cited: (1) R. v. AgarUNK(1990), 90 Cr. App. R. 318, followed. (2) R. v. DavisUNK(1993), 97 Cr. App. R. 110, applied. (3) R. v. Turner, [1970] 2 Q.B. 321; (1970), 54 Cr. App. R. 352, applied. Criminal Procedure-non-disclosure order-application for......
  • Shabalala and Others v Attorney-General, Transvaal, and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SACR 340; 1994 (1) BCLR 75) R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd (1985) 18 DLR (4th) 321 (SCC) R v Brown (Winston) [1994] 1 WLR 1599 (CA) R v Davis [1993] 1 WLR 613 R v Egger 103 DLR (4th) 678 R v H 1952 (4) SA 344 (T) H R v Keane [1994] 2 All ER 478 R v Leyland Magistrates, Ex parte Hawthorn [1979] 1 A......
  • Ward v Special Criminal Court
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 Enero 1999
    ...between a client and his her lawyers. I therefore am satisfied that this compromise arrangement must be rejected." 33 In R.v. Davis [1993] 2 ALL ER 643, the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), in England, reached a similar conclusion. The Court stated at p. 647:- "It would wholly undermine......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 7-4, December 2003
    • 1 Diciembre 2003
    ...bin Darus v Mansor @Harun binHj Saad [2001] 4 MLJ 206 .... 234, 235Rowe v Davis (1993) 97 Cr App R 110......................................................... 106Rowe and Davis v United Kingdom(2000) 30 EHRR 1........................ 109, 113, 117, 125, 127Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge ......
  • The Disclosure Sanctions Review: Another Missed Opportunity?
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 17-3, July 2013
    • 1 Julio 2013
    ...1992). 11 Although, as the RCCJ noted, the case of the Cardiff Three occurred after PACE was introduced.12 (1993) 96 Cr App R 1.13 (1993) 97 Cr App R 110.14 Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure Report (Philips Commission), Cmnd 8092 (HMSO: London, para. 42: ‘… the defence can require the ......
  • What Next for Public Interest Immunity?
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 69-1, February 2005
    • 1 Febrero 2005
    ...(SI 1997 No. 698) made by the Crown Court RulesCommittee, following the procedure set out by Taylor LJ in R vDavis, Rowe andJohnson (1993) 97 Cr App R 110 at 114.The Journal of Criminal representations at the hearing. Secondly, where the prosecutor con-sidered that revealing the category of......
  • Advising the Serious Organised Crime Agency: the role of the specialist prosecutors
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Financial Crime No. 12-3, July 2005
    • 1 Julio 2005
    ...are provided before trial. In casesinvolving covert surveillance something more con-troversial may occur. In R v Davis,Johnson and Rowe[1993] 2 All ER 643, the Court of Appeal acknowl-edged three dierent procedures for dealing with PIIclaims. In Type 1, the defence is informed of the appli......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT