R v Derek Lang and Anthony Derek Deadman
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | MR JUSTICE PITCHFORD,LORD JUSTICE KENNEDY |
| Judgment Date | 05 February 2002 |
| Neutral Citation | [2002] EWCA Crim 298 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 05 February 2002 |
| Docket Number | No: 200105297/Y5 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Sheldrake v DPP
...the question positively can perhaps be seen from the decision of the Court of Appeal Criminal Division in R v Lang and Deadman [2002] EWCA Crim 298, 5 February 2002, where the court was considering section 5(3) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1991, which was of course the very section discussed......
-
R v Angelina Malinina
...of belief or reasonable suspicion. 14 Mr Price has referred us to the cases of Forsythe [2001] EWCA Crim 2926, Lang and Deadman [2002] EWCA Crim 298 and Carrera [2002] EWCA Crim 2527. It is not necessary for us to refer to those authorities, save to say that we consider that our decision is......
2 books & journal articles
-
Regulatory Offences and Reverse Burdens: The ‘Licensing Approach’
...para. 247. 8 Miller v Minister of Pensions [1947] 2 All ER 372 at 373–4.9 R v Carr-Briant [1943] KB 607 at 612. 10 Lang and Deadman [2002] EWCA Crim 298 at [31], per Pitchford J.11 Sheldrake v DPP [2005] 1 AC 264.12 Ibid. at [1].13 Ibid.14 [1935] AC 462 at 481–2. See the text accompanying n......
-
Codifying the Law on Evidential Burdens
...suggest a defence ofprovocation. Also see Bullard v R [1957] AC 635 at 642 and Palmer v R [1971] AC814 at 823.22 R v Lang and Deadman [2002] EWCA Crim 298 at [31], per Pitchford J.Codifying the Law on Evidential it is a misnomer23 to describe the evidential burden as a burden of proof.As Lo......