R v Dickens

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date11 April 1990
Date11 April 1990
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
52 cases
  • R v Chrastny (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 8 Marzo 1991
  • Powery v R
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 20 Abril 1995
    ...12 Cr. App. R. 81, applied. (4) R. v. Cavendish, [1961] 1 W.L.R. 1083; [1961] 2 All E.R. 856, applied. (5) R. v. Dickens, [1990] 2 Q.B. 102; [1990] 2 All E.R. 626, dicta of Lord Lane, C.J. applied. (6) Reid v. R., [1980] A.C. 343; [1979] 2 All E.R. 904, dictum of Lord Diplock applied. Legis......
  • R v Rose
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 22 Diciembre 1993
    ...Drug Trafficking Offences Act 1986 there had to be prima facie evidence which entitled him to make the assumption: see R v DickensELR ([1990] 2 QB 102, 107). Accordingly it was wrong and potentially misleading to say that before a judge could make such an assumption he "must have had some r......
  • R v Comiskey
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 29 Noviembre 1990
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Proceeds of Crime and the European Convention on Human Rights
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 26 Julio 2010
    ...area." Footnotes This observation originates with Lord Lane C.J. describing the Drug Trafficking Offences Act 1996 in R v. Dickens [1990] 2 Q.B. 102; more recently, see for example R v. Briggs-Price [2009] UKHL 19; [2009] 1 A.C. 1026, per Lord Rodger at paragraph 51. Speaking on the BBC Pan......
1 books & journal articles
  • Civil Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime in Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Money Laundering Control No. 5-4, April 2002
    • 1 Abril 2002
    ...(46) Ibid. at 501. (47) DPP (Cth) v Jeffery (1992) 58 A Crim. R 310 at 312. (48) Williamson v Ah On (1926) 39 CLR 95 at 113-114. (49) [1990] 2 WLR 1384 at 1388. (50) [2001] 2 Cr. App. R 87 at 102, 116. (51) [2002] 2 WLR 235. (52) Ibid, at 244 and 253. (53) [2001] 2 Cr. App. R 490 at 509-510......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT