R v O'Doherty (Anthony)

JurisdictionNorthern Ireland
Date2002
CourtCourt of Appeal (Northern Ireland)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v Crowe
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 3 Febrero 2015
    ...EVIDENCE 2001 CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW 595 ORMEROD SOUNDING OUT EXPERT VOICE IDENTIFICATION 2002 CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW 771 R v O'DOHERTY 2002 NI 263 2003 1 CAR 77 R v ROBB 1991 93 CAR 161 DPP, PEOPLE v SHAW 1982 IR 1 DPP v COONEY 1997 3 IR 205 1998/4/846 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1984 (ELECTRONIC RE......
  • R v Kris Ronald Flynn
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 2 Mayo 2008
    ...and one decision of the CACD in Northern Ireland. They are R v Robb [1991] 93 Cr.App.R 161; R v Clare and Peach [1995] Cr.App.R 333; R v O'Doherty [2003] 1 Cr.App.R 5 (NI) and A-G's Reference [No 2 of 2002] [2003] 1 CAR 18 In Robb, the court held that voice recognition evidence given by a......
  • DPP v O'Brien
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 21 Diciembre 2015
    ...neither side specifically referred to it in submissions, the approach in Roberts was echoed in the Northern Ireland case of R v O'Doherty [2002] NI 263, [2003] 1 Cr.App.R.5. Giving judgment in the Court of Appeal Nicholson LJ emphasised the need for a suitable warning to the jury in cases ......
  • Sharon Jordan's Application
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
    • 29 Septiembre 2023
    ...admissibility and reliability of the evidence from Dr Kirchubel, in accordance with recent jurisprudence in the cases of R v O’Doherty [2002] NI 263, R v Fitzsimmons, Duffy & McCrory [2022] NICC 27 and R v Gleeson [2023] NICC 17. [44] He points out that the District Judge has already ruled ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Negligence in Regulatory Investigations
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 11 Julio 2002
    ...able to succeed in a negligence claim against a regulator? This issue was recently considered in the case of Miller v Law Society (The Times, 3 June 2002), in the context of an allegedly investigation of a solicitor's practice. The decision in Miller v Law Society Mr Miller was a solicitor ......
11 books & journal articles
  • Exemplum Habemus: Reflections on the Judicial Studies Board's Specimen Directions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 70-1, February 2006
    • 1 Febrero 2006
    ...See Z[2002] 1 WLR 1489, discussed in R. Munday, ‘Adverse Denial and PurposiveConfession’ [2003] Crim LR 850.128 [2005] UKHL 22.129 [2003] 1 Cr App R 77. The case, in fact, is O’Doherty.130 (1991) 93 Cr App R 161.131 See, e.g., Specimen Direction No. 30 sub nom. ‘Identif‌ication by DNA’, whi......
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 7-4, December 2003
    • 1 Diciembre 2003
    ...v O’Connor [2002] Ont CA LEXIS 530......................................................... 144R v O’Doherty [2003] 1 Cr App R 5..........................172, 173, 179–81, 184R v Osmaniouglu [2002] EWCA Crim930................................................... 113R v P [2001] 2 WLR 463 .........
  • Don't Mention the War: The Court of Appeal, the Criminal Cases Review Commission and Dealing with the Past in Northern Ireland
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 76-6, November 2013
    • 1 Noviembre 2013
    ...8 March 2002 unreported.134 RvLatimer [2004] NICA 3.135 RvHindes and another [2005] NICA 36.136 RvGordon [2000] NICA 28; RvO’Doherty [2002] NI 263;137 RvAdams [2006] NICA 6. Adams is included in the analysis below as, even though his case wasnot apparently sectarian, he was interviewed with......
  • The Reliability of Expert Evidence: Reflections on the Law Commission's Proposals for Reform
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 73-6, December 2009
    • 1 Diciembre 2009
    ...an admissibility requirement is the preferred route to re-form, the Law Commission acknowledges that it is not the only option.40 [2003] 1 Cr App R 5 (p. 77).41 (1991) 93 Cr App R 161.42 [2008] EWCA Crim 970. See D. Warburton and T. Lewis, ‘Opinion Evidence:Admissibility of Ad Hoc Expert Vo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT