R v Donnelly
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1998 |
| Date | 1998 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
The People (at the suit of the DPP) v Brian Shaughnessey
...Court of Appeal has on occasion sought to prescribe particular tests to be applied in alleged incompetence cases. Thus, in Donnelly [1998] Crim.L.R. 131, it was said that nothing less than flagrant incompetence would do; in Ullah [2000] 1 Cr. App. R. 351, it was said that a proper and conv......
-
R v Ullah
...went on: "We accept counsel's explanation. Mr Fulford, [who was counsel for the appellant] consistently with the latest case on this issue R v Donnelly [1998] Crim LR 131, characterised this as 'flagrant incompetence', alternatively that a decision not to adduce this evidence was 'in defia......
-
Mak Kam Chuen v Hksar
...as fragrant incompetence which can form the basis of such a challenge. See R v Clinton (1993) 97 Cr. App. R. 320; R v Donnelly [1998] Crim. L.R. 131; R v Naveed Ullah [2000] 1 Cr. App. R. 9. We are not satisfied that it is reasonably arguable that this is such a case. If two senior counsel,......
-
R v Carl Emerson Frederick
...its impact on the trial has, in the last decade, seen something of a shift, compares, for example, Clinton 97 Cr App R(S) 32O, Donnelly [1998] Crim LR 131, Ullah [2001] Cr App R 351 and Boodram v The State [2002] 1 Cr App R 1O3. But, as it seems to us, whatever test is applied to the conduc......
Request a trial to view additional results