R v Dooley (Michael)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE HOOPER
Judgment Date01 November 2005
Neutral Citation[2005] EWCA Crim 3093
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Docket NumberNo: 200504388 B4
Date01 November 2005

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Her Majesty's Advocate V. David Graham
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 27 May 2010
    ...s 52(1)(b), when another person accessed it. In Peebles (supra, at para [6]) and in R v Maunder ([2007] EWCA Crim 1254); R v Dooley, ([2006] 1 Cr App R 21) and R v Feather ([2003] EWCA Crim 3433) the images were distributed through file sharing software. [36] The Internet Watch Foundation (......
  • AC CCS 1050 2009
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 6 August 2009
    ...parent with care relied on MacDonald (Inspector of Taxes) v Dextra Accessories Ltd [2005] UKHL 47; [2005] 4 All ER 107 and R v Dooley [2005] EWCA Crim 3093; [2006] 1 WLR 775 to show that the test under paragraph 27 was not the dominant purpose test. The Commission argued for the dominant pu......
  • R v Paul Cambray
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 12 June 2006
    ...maximum by 40% should not lead to a systematic increase of each sentence for causing death by dangerous driving by 40% (see R v Gray [2006] 1 Cr App R 21 at page 126). As Maurice Kay LJ points out, the maximum was focused upon the most serious offences, but he acknowledged, as we do, that a......
  • Glen Peebles V. Her Majesty's Advocate
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 25 January 2007
    ...entitled to hold that he had the necessary mens rea for the contravention of section 52(1)(c) libelled in charge (3) (cf R v Dooley, [2006] 1 WLR 775). That offence was committed whether or not any users of the network accessed the files. [31] Counsel for the appellant submitted that on cha......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Offences Involving Misuse of Computers
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Cyber Crime - Law and Practice Contents
    • 29 August 2019
    ...authority as to the interpretation of the words ‘with a view to’ under section 3A(3). However, the Court of Appeal in R v Dooley [2005] EWCA Crim 3093, [2006] 1 Cr App R 21 gave guidance as to the meaning of those words in the context of the offence under section 1(1)(c) of the Protection o......
  • Offences Relating to Internet or Computer Content
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Cyber Crime - Law and Practice Contents
    • 29 August 2019
    ...showing to others by himself. With regard to the meaning of ‘with a view to’ under section 1(1)(c), the Court of Appeal in R v Dooley [2005] EWCA Crim 3093, [2006] 1 Cr App R 21 held that there was a necessary distinction between ‘with a view to’ and ‘with the intention of’. However, if jus......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Cyber Crime - Law and Practice Contents
    • 29 August 2019
    ...2 Cr App R (S) 80, [2003] All ER (D) 127 (Feb) 15, 16, 17 R v Dennis Chambers (1996) September, Inner London Crown Ct 184 R v Dooley [2005] EWCA Crim 3093, [2006] 1 WLR 775, [2006] 1 Cr App R 21, [2006] Crim LR 544 46, 147, 165 R v DPP, ex parte Kebeline [2000] 2 AC 326, [1999] 3 WLR 175, [......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT