R v Editor of the New Statesman—ex parte DPP
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1928 |
| Date | 1928 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Attorney General v O'Kelly
...be accepted as accurate, having regard to the subsequent decisions, R. v. Gray, [1900] 2 Q.B. 36, andR. v. Editor of the New Statesman, 44 T.L.R. 301. On an application by the Attorney-General for an order for attachment against the Editor of a newspaper for contempt of Court for causing to......
-
Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party and Others and Another Suit
... ... , Gray J examined each of the areas on which the defendants ( viz , the printer, the chief editor and the publisher, respectively, of a newspaper called “ Al Arab ”) sought to cross-examine the ... discharge of his or her functions as a judge (see Rex v Editor of the New Statesman, ex parte Director of Public Prosecutions (1928) 64 TLR 301). T S Sinnathuray J in Wong Hong Toy ... ...
-
R. v. Kopyto, (1987) 24 O.A.C. 81 (CA)
...(Que. C.A.), refd to. [paras. 107, 108, 170, 203]. R. v. Editor of the New Statesman - Ex parte Director of Public of Prosecutions (1928), 44 T.L.R. 301 (K.B.), refd to. [para. 108]. R. v. Clement, [1981] 2 S.C.R. 468; 38 N.R. 302, refd to. [para. 109]. R. v. Vermette (1987), 74 N.R. 221; 3......
-
Dhooharika v DPP
...mind. 44 As Arlidge, Eady and Smith observe at para 5–247, the decision of the Divisional Court in R v Editor of New Statesman Ex p DPP (1928) 44 TLR 301 proceeded on the basis that mens rea was not necessary. Lord Hewart CJ said at p 303 that the article complained of constituted a contemp......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Criticising judges in Ireland
...effective 7Sullivan P., quoting in support the decisions in R. v. Gray [1900] All E.R. 59 and R. v. The Editor of the New Statesman [1928] 44 Times L.R. 301, in Attorney General v. O’Kelly [1928] I.R. 308 at 8[1928] I.R. 308 at 331. 84 Judicial Studies Institute Journal [2:1 administration ......